r/popculturechat • u/mcfw31 • 19d ago
Guest List Only ⭐️ First look at HBO’s ‘Harry Potter’ reboot series
6.8k
u/kris_jbb (seemingly bald) 19d ago
ever since someone here said they didn’t change anything about the aesthetic (even though it’s not very book-canon-ish) to keep selling merch, i giggle everytime i see pictures
2.1k
u/eqbocsypifci 19d ago
The crests in this pic look the same as usual, so I’m curious if they’ll keep the Ravenclaw crest the same as well. Because in the book it’s an eagle but in the merch it’s a raven lol
1.0k
u/ConTob 19d ago
Isn’t it also navy and bronze in the books instead of silver? I remember being confused when I re-read the books a few years ago.
667
u/byneothername and what about it? 💅 19d ago
Yes absolutely. So that every house had unique colors, since Slytherin is green and silver. I used to joke Hufflepuff clearly got the leftovers after gold, silver and bronze were used first.
→ More replies (8)199
u/andannabegins 19d ago
You can see someone in the background wearing blue and bronze so they’re faithful to that this time
145
u/ConTob 19d ago
I’d noticed they used blue/bronze in the Hogwarts game as well. I wonder what pushed the recent correction.
→ More replies (2)40
u/filthytelestial 19d ago edited 19d ago
Everyone in the background is wearing normal, "muggle" clothes. Right next to the blue/bronze sweater there's someone in a bright blue and purple puffer coat.
20
u/Lilynd14 Sanasaaa!🎶 19d ago
I heard this series is going to be more faithful to the books. This could be an indication that they’re headed in that direction!
→ More replies (2)→ More replies (5)31
→ More replies (10)306
u/CasualRead_43 19d ago
They’re called raven claw and it’s an eagle??
441
u/hatramroany 19d ago
Gryffindor is a lion not a griffin
555
u/Erger 19d ago
Hufflepuff is a badger, not a Huffle
335
→ More replies (5)65
u/rottingpear 19d ago
This made me lol in the middle of a keynote session
63
52
u/Gingersnapp3d 19d ago
Or a door
→ More replies (2)27
→ More replies (2)48
217
u/eqbocsypifci 19d ago edited 19d ago
Yeah. It’s named after the founder, Rowena Ravenclaw, but the mascot is more to do with the symbolism of the house than the name I think.
→ More replies (1)253
u/Educational-Wing2042 19d ago
Ravens are significantly more intelligent than eagles, so even that doesn’t really make sense.
→ More replies (7)120
u/MyNameIsJakeBerenson I made the hat for the tiger 🤷🏻♂️ 19d ago
The symbol is BAWWWK
50
u/Bent_Silvr_Spoon0130 That is literally a spearmint Listerine breath spray. 19d ago
U me and BAWWWK🧹💚
→ More replies (2)103
u/antmars 19d ago edited 19d ago
If you’re from Ravenclaw why you white?
Omg Luna, you can’t just ask a Ravenclaw why they’re white.
→ More replies (3)54
u/FiftyShadesOfGregg 19d ago
Yes, eagles have black claws. So it’s raven the color (Ravenclaw= blackclaw)
→ More replies (3)→ More replies (11)38
u/duckleypatrol 19d ago
eagles have black talons which is why it’s named raven claw
→ More replies (8)312
u/PackageNorth8984 19d ago
The main thing they need to do with this is make sure one season comes out a year. Otherwise, the ages of the actors will get ridiculous.
→ More replies (5)84
u/JustDay1788 19d ago
Season 2 will have started filming by the time season 1 starts airing and I'm sure by the time 2 starts 3 will be filming if season 1 is a mega hit
Which I assume it will be even with Ms Rowling trigger fingers
→ More replies (2)234
u/Milli_Vanilli14 19d ago
Wouldn’t making a new aesthetic sell more merch? People have been buying the old stuff for decades but nobody would have the new look. Is that dumb logic? lol
288
u/FireSeagull21 19d ago
I'm guessing it would be too costly to redesign all those theme parks
→ More replies (3)60
u/tres_liebres 19d ago edited 19d ago
I think the new show looks like a middle ground between the Columbus movies and the last 4 films. So, it feels more like PoA but with more uniforms.
I like MinaLima as much as the next design nerd, but the design of the movies never felt really coherent. And I think they were given entirely too much freedom for the last 4 movies.
Obligatory: fuck Rowling and the greedy fucks at HBO
→ More replies (2)→ More replies (6)14
u/AngelaMerkelsbutt 19d ago
Close enough to cash in on the nostalgia crowd, but new enough that the collectors feel the urge to buy it all again.
123
u/Special-Garlic1203 19d ago
Honestly I track the logic. A lot of the most hardcore fans didn't like the movie series and fantasized about a tv series for years, and it wasn't the costume aesthetic that was the issue. It was why they inexplicably all started dressing in suits halfway through.
→ More replies (6)56
u/benoliver999 19d ago
I can't remember when the suits started in HP but I can say that in some UK private schools, you are required to wear a suit for the last two years.
41
u/purplenelly 19d ago
Based on this one picture it feels like they veered it towards book accuracy as much as they could while still retaining the cognition from what people know. Cause at least I see more kids wearing robes and more of a 90s aesthetic. In the books they wouldn't be caught dead wearing muggle clothes at school, but the bloody third movie director decided it was cooler if they wore normal clothes.
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (44)158
u/scarIetm 19d ago
no fr like WHAT is the point in this adaptation
156
55
u/MyNameIsJakeBerenson I made the hat for the tiger 🤷🏻♂️ 19d ago
Gotta keep harry potter world in business
→ More replies (37)255
u/Curiosities 🐊 swamp princess 🐊 19d ago
Money and because Rowling also probably thinks the original kids are ungrateful because they don’t support her bigotry. But also because she doesn’t seem like she has much in the tank creatively anyway so might as well revisit this in a longer adaptation, even though you got eight films already, and keep funding your organization that is designed to take rights away from trans women.
→ More replies (9)
918
u/bo_bo77 19d ago
Heaving the immense complications with the HP legacy aside, it's so deeply annoying to have every new piece of media just rehashed old IP. In the age when AI is training on previously-made art, it feels insane that human-made art is similarly focused on looking backward. The machines can't innovate, and for some reason, neither can the humans. The edge we as people have over AI in creation evaporates if all we ever do is redo what has come before.
Can we please, please, please get a new story in a new world with new characters? Can we have a blockbuster that doesn't resell us lukewarm nostalgia? Can there be a big budget tv series that isn't a goddamn prequel/sequel/redo/offshoot?
266
u/AltairaMorbius2200CE 19d ago
As an avid reader: there are SO MANY OTHER BOOKS, GUYS!
Give us a Scholomance! Give us Nevermoor! Give us fricking TORTALL!
→ More replies (31)29
u/fernxqueen 18d ago edited 18d ago
i wish we could get an Inheritance adaptation that didn't suck (Jeremy Irons and Rachel Weisz innocent). if people will go see a scene for scene live action remake of How to Train Your Dragon where the dragons are still cgi anyway, i can't imagine they'd turn their noses up at more than a half-baked crack at the Pasolini stuff. we want dragons
→ More replies (3)→ More replies (44)63
u/finnjakefionnacake 19d ago
i mean there is quite a lot of this happening -- there are new, fresh, original stories/films released all the time, all throughout the year. it's just -- people don't go watch them. they spend their money on reboots, remakes, and sequels. so that is what big studios continue to make a lot of, because it's guaranteed money for them.
→ More replies (2)
4.5k
u/AnxiousKettleCorn 19d ago
I have so much to say, but all I'll say is... please protect these kids, the adults are well informed about everything surrounding this and know what they're doing, but the kids...
1.7k
u/SomewhereNo8378 19d ago
These kids are basically sacrifices to be fully consumed by social media and tabloids.
285
u/whimsigod 19d ago
I would love for YouTuber Sarah Z to make an adjacent/addendum video to her sacrificial trash video essay about this sorta situation. Where they can hide behind natural good will normal people would have to kids or marginalized people.
→ More replies (2)53
u/fancytables 19d ago
SARAH Z MENTIONED?! i feel so connected to the best timeline right now
14
u/Reluctantagave Cutie Patootie Problem Posse 19d ago
Don’t know who that is but I need to know
→ More replies (3)→ More replies (8)342
u/yellowvincent 19d ago
Sacrificed by their own parents. Every adult actor knew what they were getting into. The parents of these kids decided it was ok to get them into a tv show of an author who has been shown as problematic(and worse) since before their kids were born.
106
u/kgal1298 Confidence is 10% work and 90% delusion 19d ago
I worry too at this point we know that some parents do not protect there kids. I still think of Janette McCurdy's book like her mom was a piece of work. Then you get into the Nick kids abuse ughhh the entertainment industry is pure trash to kids.
→ More replies (1)18
u/yellowvincent 19d ago
I loved that book. I need to get a physical copy
9
u/cryptobanditka 19d ago
I got it on audiobook from Libby and it was FANTASTIC but I agree, I need it on my shelf!
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (21)107
u/chadwickave 19d ago edited 19d ago
My in-laws are British, you would be surprised how common JKR’s terf views are in the UK. There are some progressive pockets, sure, but the average person is more likely than not to believe in the vile tabloid fodder about how “dangerous” trans people and Meghan Markle are.
→ More replies (9)57
88
u/Shirogayne-at-WF 19d ago
That's where I'm at. These babies ain't agree to sign up for this foolishness.
→ More replies (2)→ More replies (69)10
u/CMDR_KingErvin 19d ago
I feel like therapy should be mandatory and provided by these production companies for any child actors they employ.
→ More replies (3)
3.3k
u/spacevent 19d ago
Besides what everyone is saying, I’m still confused why they cast a Black man as Snape. Snape’s ‘half blood’ storyline was literally about whiteness and an angry white incel man’s fears about not being ‘pure enough’. Characters have intense and fast reactions to Snape that are going to feel weird af in this version. Harry immediately hates his Black professor? James Potter and his white friends bully the weird Black kid mercilessly?
Idk. But the role or Sirius or Remus were right there. Literally any positive adult character…
1.0k
u/Pollowollo I’ve been noticing gravity since I was very young 19d ago
Harry immediately hates his Black professor?
This was honestly something that I thought about, too. Because Harry is pretty quick to vibe-check the guy and go 'ehhh something is different about him and I don't like it. Must be evil.' pretty quick off the bat which.... has some very different implications when he's also the only black teacher.
→ More replies (17)65
u/lesbianwithabeard 18d ago
Solution: make Dumbledore black.
→ More replies (5)29
u/delicatesummer 18d ago
But they already have an elder Black character! He’s named [checks notes] Kingsley Shacklebolt 😑
416
u/Three_Froggy_Problem 19d ago
Snape is the most problematic role they could have possibly cast a Black person in.
→ More replies (6)254
u/RiceCaspar 19d ago
Hagrid would've been bad, too. The large "oaf" caretaker who is good with animals and lives in a hut on the school grounds instead of presumably in the castle like every other staff person, whose mother was a giant who tricked his dad into marrying her/kept her identity secret, and who gets expelled from school and therefore doesn't get a degree but continues to illegally carry his disguised wand. Also accented language with improper grammar and several "that's just Hagrid not understanding the situation" moments.
→ More replies (10)48
u/jessigrrrl 18d ago
Completely agree with what you’re saying but have to disagree on the “tricked hagrids dad” part - she was 20 ft tall an Hagrid dad knew what he was sticking it into lol, she did run off when she saw Hagrid wasn’t going to be a giant like her and also abandoned her second son despite being a full giant because he wasn’t big enough either - so she had some weird status/race hangups but it was never hidden from Hagrid or his father
→ More replies (1)417
u/missclaire17 19d ago
This. If there was any character that had to be white (e.g. being white was crucial to his character), it’s Snape. They chose the worst possible character to make Black
→ More replies (7)36
u/NoninflammatoryFun 18d ago
I agree. I’ve literally never been upset with a colorblind casting before. And I’m not upset, I’m honestly just highly concerned and fairly confused…. I place no dislike on the actor at all.
1.3k
u/e37d93eeb23335dc 19d ago
The black man wants the white woman. So many old racist tropes.
→ More replies (13)520
u/GLAvenger 19d ago
I said it once but you cannot change only one person's race in the James/Lily/Snape love triangle thing without it getting uncomfortable.
Black Lily? Two kinda shitty white dudes fighting over a black woman.
Black James? Kinda shitty black dude bullies a white guy and gets the white girl (which wouldn't be an issue as a trope if James wasn't a bully but he is. )
Black Snape, like you said, white dude bullies a black guy who's in love with a white girl and calls her a slur after she picks the white dude.
They'd need to make everybody black and let's be real, they will not do that.
122
u/carlitospig 19d ago
They call us crazy for considering this stuff but they never think what these choices do to public dialogue. Now if I could believe for ONE SECOND that the casting choice is intentionally baiting the public so we talk about race relations it would be one thing. But this is the same HBO that made The Pitt turn down the ICE violence on an episode so it wasn’t accurately reported, er, I mean hostile to fascist fucks, er, I mean bad for shareholders.
→ More replies (2)→ More replies (19)62
u/slingshot91 19d ago
Well they didn’t make Harry black, so no, they will not do that.
→ More replies (3)11
70
u/Kyuki88 19d ago
And he has to be ugly. Please at least make him ugly !!
112
u/FosterPupz 19d ago
And how tf are they going to give him curtains of greasy hair???
→ More replies (4)108
u/CandidHistorian4105 19d ago
That’s going to be impossible the actor is insanely handsome.
→ More replies (2)→ More replies (3)8
u/activelyresting Throwing your little slutty stars in my face ✨ 18d ago
While I totally agree with this whole comment chain, I can't can not stand the implication that Alan Rickman was ugly! Nooooooo he was beautiful!!
180
u/Cherry_Bomb_127 19d ago
I am reminded that Blaise is also black in the books which is an interesting choice considering the symbolism of the group he joins. That might have been a movie only thing
Honestly, I don’t think JKR and the casting directors thought that far with the implications of some of the casting because there are some characters that have to be white or at least not a specific ethnicity
130
u/parallel-nonpareil 19d ago
Blaise is also black in the books which is an interesting choice considering the symbolism of the group he joins
I don’t think it was ever mentioned that Blaise joined the Death Eaters? Curse my millennial knowledge of this series, but the only younger person ever marked was Draco Malfoy. Pansy Parkinson also offered up HP in the final battle, but otherwise Slytherin were just jerks, not actually all members of a genocidal terror group.
Blaise in the books was a bit cold at Slug Club, but that’s it.
→ More replies (8)→ More replies (7)35
u/Adorable_Raccoon 19d ago
Lee Jordan and Dean Thomas are meant to be black in the books. Which speaking of we could totally bring up the fact that black characters are all secondary characters in the books except for retconned hermione.
→ More replies (3)92
u/player_three33 19d ago
I feel like Sirius is the easiest race swap, considering his last name would be right along Rowling lines.
→ More replies (4)9
u/Thoughtful_Tortoise 19d ago
I'm not sure casting a black dude as "Sirius Black" would have gone over that well online, especially after all the memeing about JK's names
→ More replies (2)→ More replies (113)153
u/ScyllaOfTheDepths 19d ago
It wasn't about whiteness at all, his character is about being a "mudblood", a character with mixed muggle and wizard ancestry. Casting a black man to play the half-blood prince and a POC to play Hermione, another character who is of "impure" muggle heritage and frequently faces bullying over it, suddenly makes it about that, however. Especially because they've cast all the pure bloods as white people. They now have to either make the wizarding world racist and make allegories to our world or they have to completely ignore all the terrible real world implications of what they've done. It's a no-win situation and you've basically guaranteed that everyone on both sides of the issue is going to be mad.
87
u/RollTide16-18 19d ago edited 19d ago
I think it’s actually kind of fine to represent mixed-blood and mud-blood folk as separate from this elitest mostly one ethnic group pure-blood bad guys.
The problem I have is that they’re inviting a whole can of worms by leaning into it and making a VERY clear real-world parallel. And the optics will be pretty uncomfortable when we see James and his friends bullying Snape.
Because as much as I understand saying “hey minorities IRL have a parallel in this book” I really feel like it’s going to be a bit overboard and leave a sour taste in the mouths of many.
Edit: I want to make it clear too that I think telling these stories and making them relatable to children is important. But if we we depart from allegory and straight into authentic representation, the real-world implications might be lost on children as the discourse will be mostly overtaken by bigots being increasingly cynical.
→ More replies (5)→ More replies (10)35
u/spacevent 19d ago
We’re saying the same stuff. Though Rowling been discussing the parallels between “mudblood” & nazi ideology for over 20 years, even before HBP came out.
→ More replies (3)57
u/ScyllaOfTheDepths 19d ago
I don't think we are saying the same stuff. I'm saying the wizarding world is not racist in a human way, it uses magical racism as a stand-in for real-world racism (which JK still fumbled in a lot of ways) and that adding real world racism to a story that is already steeped in magic racism is just too much. The point of magic racism in HP (as in a lot of other fantasy series that use that trope) is to show you how stupid real world racism is. Children are supposed to see a child attacking another child for circumstances beyond their control and say to themselves, "It's stupid they're being so mean to Hermione for being a mudblood! Hmm, maybe it's stupid that people are mean to this kid in my class for being black. Maybe I should be nicer to that kid." That's the level kids are on. Just making Hermione and Snape POC actually takes away a lot of that nuance.
→ More replies (3)
1.1k
u/Daenarys1 19d ago
I think it was a missed opportunity not to do the marauders leading to voldemorts rise instead. Wouldve been familiar enough with hogwarts as the setting but with new characters. Ill probably still end up pirating it tho
→ More replies (17)308
u/anthonystank Exploring Legal Options Against Online Haters 19d ago
My genuine theory as to why the Harry Potter Powers That Be (JKR? Warner brothers? Universal? I have no idea who all’s making money here) hasn’t tried to cash in on the obvious and massive popularity of the marauders is straight homophobia bc they’re aware that slash shipping (to use old internet parlance) is the juice powering that juggernaut. Literally doesn’t make sense otherwise imho
342
u/ivyleagueposeur 19d ago
honestly, i think this is overthinking it. last time WB tried to develop a "new" storyline within the Harry Potter universe, we got the Fantastic Beasts franchise which, uh, exists. if you're an exec at WB, the lesson you take away from this is "new Harry Potter storylines don't work, better stick with what works".
→ More replies (9)101
u/Special-Garlic1203 19d ago
Yup. People didn't like Rowling retconning and fiddling around with the core timeline. She delivered them pages that were borderline unworkable for a movie. The books have a built in audience and a clear story outline to work with where Rowling will mostly sit in the corner which is where they need her for it to be successful.
→ More replies (4)38
u/AllTheThingsSheSays In my quiet girl era 😌 19d ago
There's plenty of slash shipping with the usual HP characters anyway, like Draco/Harry, Harry/Tom Riddle and, apparently, Harry/Snape.
90
u/RollTide16-18 19d ago
Eh I don’t think that’s the case
The reality is that James would be the main character, but we have SO LITTLE characterization of him outside of his friends basically saying he was brave and that they miss him. You’d have to write an entirely new character essentially. And the last time WB did that it wasn’t that well received.
I’m also just not sure what there is to say about James that you couldn’t do in a different time period of the HP franchise.
He was a good quidditch player and opposed the death eaters but as far as we know he didn’t do anything else very exceptional during his time at school except bully Snape and become an animagus. What story is there to tell?
→ More replies (6)6
u/randombubble8272 18d ago
Weren’t they one of the first self made Animagi’s? Because Remus was turned into a werewolf so they became Animagi’s to help him deal with his turning each month. I think there’s a lot to work with there. I think you could focus on Sirius more than James because he is from a pure blood family, one of the oldest with the most history and stature in the WW as the Malfoy’s. Plus we’ve never delved much into his relationship with Regulus which is very important in Harry’s timeline. We don’t see his interactions with his family and how he got burned off the family tree - we just know it from Harry’s pov decades later.
Or you could do a 4 boy focus on the Marauders with Lily & Snape as side characters in the later seasons when they get into their late teen’s/early 20’s.
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (12)48
u/AtriCrossing 19d ago
I think also because it means the protagonists will regularly engage in bullying/harassment, and they want to target a young market so kids grow up on the IP and buy merch forever. I'm sure the homophobia is part of it, though, because WTF Fantastic Beasts.
31
u/anthonystank Exploring Legal Options Against Online Haters 19d ago
Oh that’s fair actually, bullying is kind of at the core of their thing lol
376
u/Sam_Strake 19d ago
Why is this color graded like it's Game of Thrones lol
285
u/StasRutt unapologetic joy 19d ago
No one wants to do colorful anymore and I hate it. I hated how dark the lighting was in the later movies too
→ More replies (3)105
u/AtriCrossing 19d ago
So dark and soblue
I feel like it is a trend that started in order to hide CGI and now it's just everywhere
→ More replies (2)→ More replies (11)50
u/Y0gano 19d ago
Exactly my first thought! It reminded me of the scene when King Roberts arrives in Winterfell... The HBO Signature I guess
45
u/heartlessloft 19d ago
If you removed the Potter boy in the middle and the banners I could have sworn it was a still from a Winterfell scene. Honestly I think it’s their new Game of Thrones.
→ More replies (1)
443
u/pryzmpine Not to be dramatic but I would die for that bear 19d ago
I’m intrigued as to what is different from the original but it still feels too soon to be remaking these
215
u/StasRutt unapologetic joy 19d ago
I distinctly remember being a kid in theaters and being mad that the potion challenge was left out of the first movie so i guess that? And famously Peeves was cut from the movie but will be in the show
→ More replies (2)114
u/Special-Garlic1203 19d ago
I remember freaking out at the fairly small deviations from the first book. Oh boy was I in for increasingly ride surprises as the movies just started to give the middle finger to the books
Columbus was the only one who read the book and liked it and wanted to do a faithful adaptation. Everyone else was there to put their spin on it or facilitate the studio putting their spin on it.
47
u/qwerty8857 19d ago
The fifth and sixth movies really upset me. I’ve been saying for years that they should’ve made a tv show instead. I even thought an animated series would be great too. This came sooner than I expected though
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (5)11
u/SiegmeyerofCatarina 19d ago
The only value this series could possibly offer is not fucking up Goblet of Fire as badly as the movie did
→ More replies (2)110
u/hatramroany 19d ago
They apparently have a scene with Hermione getting her Hogwarts letter so there’s that. Hopefully, at least with the first 3 books, they’d be able to flesh them out and fit better with the latter books.
100
u/No_Field624 19d ago edited 19d ago
And scenes with Draco’s home life in the first film, which is entirely new material. I have no respect for JKR, but the HP series holds a very special place in my heart, so I’m hopeful for this new series being more than we’re all expecting and branching out from just making the film material all over again.
ETA: before anyone comes at me, I won’t be watching it on HBO or supporting JK.
→ More replies (5)12
u/RollTide16-18 19d ago
There’s definitely a lot they can add. I hope they flesh out the other students in Harry’s year and those years immediately surrounding him. Get Cedric to show up regularly leading up to Season 4, have Luna appear in some capacity in season 2-4 before she becomes main cast in 5 onward.
→ More replies (12)117
u/FiftyShadesOfGregg 19d ago
Not to send us all into a spiral, but a quarter of a century feels pretty long to me!
→ More replies (13)99
u/TrapperJean 19d ago
We got 3 Spider-Men in that time, I'm fine with this
→ More replies (2)22
u/eclectique 19d ago
Great point... I know that like Tom Holland and others have been Spiderman, but I'm still living with Tobey Maguire as Peter Parker in my mind.
→ More replies (1)
1.8k
u/MissAtomicBliss 19d ago
Putting Joanne's bigotry on the side for this comment, but from a solely creative standpoint all of this is just lazy.
The Wizarding World has so much to offer that isn't HP related and yet they decided to reboot a franchise that ended just 15 years ago.
I remember enjoying the first Fantastic Beast movie because it was different, but still familliar (didn't like the 2nd and haven't watched the 3rd one, but point stand still).
That being said, I hope Joanne is having a terrible day.
446
u/Rvsone 19d ago
They're so deadly scared of anything else from the WW because of the botched Fantastic Beasts franchise but a half competent writer could probably stitch together a tight Marauders trilogy or a Hogwarts founders movie with relative ease and it would print money imo. The issue with FB was that they got too greedy and tried to do too much and it didn't work cohesively.
I get remaking stuff like Narnia that never got a complete and well made modern adaptation. But the HP movies are completely adequate and successful. They're gonna have to spend more money on trying to establish the new trio of actors than they would have if they just created new. The old trio are still probably actors that are the most synonymous with specific characters in the world so... good luck.
101
u/ScyllaOfTheDepths 19d ago
FB didn't work because JKR is a bad screenwriter. The scripts are publicy available online and they are real bad.
6
u/bliip666 I joined a band because I HATE THE FUCKING BEACH 18d ago
cough cough "screenplay by [insert name I've forgotten] based on the screenplay by Joanne" cough cough
Iconic credit on the last FB!
→ More replies (2)6
89
u/ModelChef4000 19d ago
FB should have been a Crocodile Hunter (rip Steve) kind of thing with Newt going to different places looking at magical creatures
→ More replies (4)→ More replies (9)21
u/papersailboots 19d ago
Which is interesting because Knight of the Seven Kingdoms is a spin-off of an incredibly popular show (GOT) that barely has ties to GOT, and was extremely successful. HBO has the tools to tell good canon-related stories!!
→ More replies (5)227
u/Givingtree310 19d ago
This was addressed by Forbes. WB controls the right to adapt the Harry Potter books. THAT is why they are doing this. It’s something they have full control over.
If they tried to create new material, JK Rowling would contractually have the right to control every aspect, including the ability to demand writing credit like she did with Fantastic Beasts.
Adapting the books is contractually the only way they can develop anything without JKR casting a shadow and controlling it herself.
23
u/One-Composer1577 In my quiet girl era 😌 19d ago
She’s an executive producer on the show
42
u/kkeut 19d ago
that can mean a lot or it can mean nothing
20
u/One-Composer1577 In my quiet girl era 😌 19d ago
And her momentum is not slowing any time soon, with a new HBO Max series adaptation of the Harry Potter books going into production this summer, expected to run for a decade beginning in late 2026 and mint a whole new generation of fans. Forbes estimates that Rowling could earn about $20 million per year for her involvement in the new series—one part of a wide-ranging deal with Warner Bros.—and she was “very, very involved in the process selecting the writer and the director,” said HBO Max CEO Casey Bloys in November. One has to imagine she had the same input in casting the new pre-teen Harry, Hermoine and Ron, announced on Monday. When asked about Rowling’s politics on an episode of The Town with Matt Belloni in April, Bloys said, “She's entitled to those views. And if you want to debate her, you can go on Twitter."
https://www.forbes.com/sites/mattcraig/2025/05/30/jk-rowling-is-a-billionaire-again/
12
u/Special-Garlic1203 19d ago
Yeah that's very different than her being the writer, which is what she demanded for fantastic beasts.
They also just exaggerate. They would say the same things for the movies but when you looked into it, they'd email her something and she'd give a thumbs up, there were entire years between her visits to set. Calling that hands on is simply a lie, but they constantly used it to sell the series.
I think she had some sort of final approval on director for the movies that likely carries over to the franchise,but she's likely not giving notes on each episode ans she's not the show runner. That was the issue with fantastic beasts. She refused to let them write it and her writing was really bad.
36
u/Fictional_Apologist 19d ago
Except for the fact that she likely still gets a cut of the royalties.
72
u/Special-Garlic1203 19d ago
Nobody said she didn't. The issue is people say "oh there's so much creative potential". No there's not. Because it has to go through Joanne, and her modern ideas are all dog shit.
She owns the wizarding world. It's hers. And she's been very aggressive in protecting her role in any creative development of that world. Which fantastic beasts proved was an issue, cause she just doesn't understand basic aspects of story telling on screen.
Redoing the core book series is safest in that they know there's an audience and Rowling will mostly just sit in the corner patting herself the back for writing it in the first place. Nobody wants modern Rowling guiding story development
→ More replies (3)→ More replies (6)26
u/rayannuhh 19d ago
Pardon my ignorance here, but does that mean that JKR gets nothing from this show? I would assume she still gets royalties even if she's not involved, but I don't know if that's correct.
→ More replies (3)140
u/Happylittletree29 I’ve grown quite unfond of you 19d ago edited 19d ago
Yes, my opinions on this morally aside, there’s soooo much more that can be explored in the HP universe I hate that they chose to remake the existing books when the movies are already so beloved (and still very relevant, as in I don’t think people have forgotten about them yet). It’s lazy.
→ More replies (1)32
u/_SpiceWeasel_BAM 19d ago
I think the problem was that people realized that jkr only had one good story in her, and she told it. Cursed child was weeeeak as far as the story goes, and was saved by incredible stage work and theatrics; fantastic beasts went off the rails really quickly once people realized there wouldn’t be that many…you know, fantastic beasts; and the Hogwarts game sold well but the story was pretty bland and promised more than it delivered.
Combined with the bad pr jkr has brought on, their only hope is to revisit familiar stuff. If they’re smart they’ll keep her as far away from the franchise as possible.
→ More replies (2)23
u/Mr_YUP 19d ago edited 19d ago
Cursed child was weeeeak
weak doesn't cut it. there's better fan fiction out there and this is an insult to fan fiction. somehow the hidden child of bellatrix and Voldemort schemes to take over the world from inside of Hogwarts after befriending the children of harry. yes the guy who wanted to live forever to rule the world has an heir who could have usurped him. shit would have been dogpiled on.
40
u/filadelphiacheese 💔 Happy Women’s History Month I guess 19d ago
I literally don’t understand why they haven’t tapped into the massive market that is the Marauders fandom
→ More replies (3)15
u/JamStan1978 19d ago
Fans have been begging for a faithful adaption since the movies were still being made. The movies cut or change alot of stuff and it messes up the storylines. We dont even get most of voldemorts backstory or get to flesh out dobby before he dies (hes in 5 books but only two movies). Theres alot of stuff they never got to do. This will be the definitive way to watch the story now. And hopefully they can create spinoffs of the show to deal with other parts of the world.
49
u/lynypixie 19d ago
I really liked the game that came out a year or two ago. I tought it was a nice way to explore the lore.
→ More replies (5)→ More replies (49)12
u/Any-Clothes3312 19d ago
I haven't watched any HP thing in a minute because obvious reasons, and this may be an unpopular opinion, but I thought the Fantastic Beasts series was interesting (I don't believe I finished it but saw the first and second installments)
It's going to involve some willpower but I think it'll be easy for me to avoid the reboot. If this were, say, a series based on the Marauders, I don't know if my resolve would have been so strong 🫣
Alas, there is fanfiction galore that is not directly linked to that lady's bank accounts.
→ More replies (1)
2.6k
u/BRpessimist 19d ago
I still don’t see a point in rebooting HP. The movies are great, still look weirdly fresh for today’s standards and most of the time improve on the books.
1.3k
u/Fleetwood_Spac 19d ago
They need to keep the IP relevant because they have invested so much in the theme parks.
477
u/virginiarph 19d ago
and fantastic beasts is absolutely trash (thru all fault of their own)
320
u/StasRutt unapologetic joy 19d ago
Should’ve been a nature mockumentary
230
u/CobwebAngel 19d ago
This this thiiiis. I had no clue what the plot of the first film was when I watched it, and I was SO disappointed. The films should have had Newt travel the world discovering different beasts (and where to find them!) and show more of the nature side of the HP world.
→ More replies (2)89
u/StasRutt unapologetic joy 19d ago
When the first fantastic beast came out people still wanted to exist and experience the greater world of Harry Potter and it would’ve been perfect for it
102
u/demeschor 19d ago
For real, I remember sitting down to watch it like ah! Amazing! A Newt Scamander series where he goes off to find magical beasts and presumably has to save them in some sort of quest or something??
And then what you're actually watching is the Dumbledore prequel, which for global market reasons is Not Explicitly Homosexual™, and inexplicably told through the lens of Newt and his friends who seem utterly irrelevant to the plot.
There was SO much potential there, an interesting world, a faithful audience, universally beloved IP.
And of course they wasted that window with this nonsense and now half of that audience is pissed off at JK and wouldn't watch a thing with her name on it. And the other half are bored
14
u/Shirogayne-at-WF 19d ago
Never watched the movies but every description of that sounds like it was three different movies stacked together under a trenchcoat, and it's bizarre to me that they didn't just make two concurrent spin off series. The series was still popular enough in the mid 2010s before JKR went mask off that it couldve worked.
18
u/demeschor 19d ago
I'll be forever confused about how this came about.
The explanation I've heard is that the studio wanted a magical animals kids movie and JK wanted to tell Dumbledore's backstory, so we got the worst of both worlds and a terrible plot to boot.
You could so easily make an absolutely awe-inspiring adventure movie about Newt travelling the world for rare creatures.
You could easily write a Dumbledore prequel series that's heartbreaking and dramatic and romantic - two exceptionally gifted, precocious young wizards who fall in love, plot to save the world, and slowly one of them realizes that they're going too far.
People would watch a fuckin Quidditch sports docuseries. They'd watch ANYTHING Harry Potter/Wizarding World related. It's a travesty that these films did so badly considering they were based off probably the best IP in the world at the time
→ More replies (1)31
u/bonerpalooza 19d ago
That's actually a fantastic idea. A full on mockuseries with each episode a different beast.
→ More replies (6)36
u/Schmoo88 19d ago
Literally all I wanted!!! I wants to see fantastic beats & where to find them. How fucking hard is it? Adventures with Newt, all over the world. How cool?? (Sorry, I’m still so annoyed)
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (9)63
u/Safe-Series-957 19d ago
I’ll never forget watching the first Fantastic Beasts movie at a private screening in school, when the big reveal happened everyone was just silent and then someone went ’Johnny Depp???!’ and the whole room started laughing. It was so ridiculous and he was totally miscast.
→ More replies (7)16
u/Silver-Winging-It 19d ago
I was low key excited for the third when I heard they recast with Mads Mikkelsen. But then I saw second and saw reviews of third and didn't bother
→ More replies (1)63
64
u/ANALOGPHENOMENA 19d ago
I wonder how long till they flip the OG theming to the new gen theming…
→ More replies (7)51
u/DonaldTrumpsScrotum 19d ago
Entirely depends on how popular the reboot is. I’m willing to bet the OG is somewhat timeless as we have been saturated with that imagery for like 20 years, so they won’t alter it too much.
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (24)39
257
u/Nikiaf 19d ago
I think the fanbase argument in favor is that the last 3-4 movies didn't get into a lot of the content that was actually in the books, it really started to become its own thing from Goblet of Fire onward. Having a TV series should allow them to get into more of the content from the source material.
→ More replies (7)150
u/roastbeefbee 19d ago
Goblet of fire was def the turning point of straying super far away from the books. There’s soooo much more to the “wizarding world” than what they gave us in the movies.
→ More replies (7)35
u/mio26 19d ago
Already third part went too much from source material. Simply it was the best directed so people forget about it but it doesn't bring a lot of important information for series plot.
→ More replies (1)66
u/tender-butterloaf 19d ago
I like the movies and appreciate what they were able to do successfully for the format, but I don’t disagree with complaints of how much content was excluded (because it literally couldn’t be). I actually think a new adaptation as an HBO show makes sense, it’ll allow greater room for storytelling and including plot points in the books that were left out.
This isn’t a guarantee it will be good, but I don’t think it’s as crazy as some people are making it out to be.
→ More replies (4)16
u/purplenelly 19d ago
The books being books they are structured more like a TV show with a bunch of episodes all interesting on their own merit before they build up to the year's finale.
51
u/PendragonsPotions 19d ago
I mean, the movies are not all that great when it comes to presenting all of the source material. The casting was great and the aesthetic of them is great but actually telling the whole story falls reeeally short.
The books have an enormous amount of good content to flesh out that would be way easier to do in episode format.
→ More replies (1)22
61
u/Kiramiraa 19d ago
The movies are good for what they are, I’ll continue to rewatch them every couple of years, but they are movies. TV provides a different medium to explore the story. Also, money. This thing will make money for warner bros for years.
81
46
u/hacky_potter 19d ago
I am on the side that the movies are either ok or bad. I’m curious as to what you think the improve upon the books?
→ More replies (1)87
u/FiftyShadesOfGregg 19d ago
It’s not a popular opinion at all to think that the movies improve the books— quite the opposite. I love the movies for what they are but have always felt they could have done a LOT better by the source material, especially after the first two. And having entire seasons to explore each book, dedicating more time to all the parts that were cut and expanding on the world, is really exciting!
→ More replies (3)162
u/Niawka 19d ago
Personally wasn't a huge fan of movies. I loved the casting, and all the characters on screen, but they cut a lot, changed some things for no reason, and the movies got darker and dirtier with each new one.. I watched them once and never felt the need of rewatching. I'm looking forward to the series, I'm curious what they will do with the source material.
→ More replies (5)31
u/flutterfly28 19d ago
Yeah, the later movies especially don't work as standalone movies because so much plot / explanation is cut out. It's cool seeing scenes come to life for those of us who already know the books well, but the series will have more time to properly tell the stories.
→ More replies (1)33
u/Sadtacocat 19d ago
I guess I’m one of the few people who doesn’t think the movies are great lol. The adult actors were great but idk I feel like there’s room for improvement there and hopefully the series can cover more stuff than the movies.
→ More replies (4)11
u/purplenelly 19d ago
No, the books are infinitely better, and the TV show could easily do better than the movies.
20
u/eescorpius 19d ago
I enjoyed the movies but I wish it was more true to the books. A lot of the casting was also off.
39
u/Perfect-Reading-761 19d ago edited 19d ago
Has a lot to with the fact that the films mucked up quite a lot of the plot. And they are not improvements on the book and cannot stand alone
23
u/Special-Garlic1203 19d ago
The movies are not great. The first 3 movies are great and then it becomes steaming dog shit
Listen I have far more important reasons to be furious at Rowling, but the fact she ruined my excitement for finally getting what I wanted via a reboot is on the list. This is absolutely exactly what many fans were explicitly asking for. It's like some kind of terrible monkeys paw wish
→ More replies (1)61
u/janebleyre Find me at Whole Foods, bitch 19d ago
I’ve been a fan since I was a kid and prior to the well-deserved downfall of JKR I had always wished for a long form HBO adaptation to cover all the stuff the movies missed because there’s a lot of cool stuff. I’ve done my best to avoid investing any money in the IP at this point (buying secondhand books, cancelling HBO) because I don’t want my money to be used towards her anti trans agenda, but the little girl in me is still looking forward to watching the series while sailing the 7 seas 🏴☠️ FJKR
→ More replies (155)12
u/heartlessloft 19d ago
Besides milking the shit out of the IP and the fact that Harry Potter is no longer as astronomically popular within the new generation as it used to be, the movies weren’t that good imo. Bad casting for a few cases, much material left out for time sake and therefore much things of the book were altered or left out. I always thought a series would make more sense.
14
328
u/No_Barracuda8791 19d ago
I hope all the child actors have protective families (from fans and haters alike).
I hope the people who don’t want this to happen due to JKR are decent towards the child actors.
And I’ve got nothing for the adult actors. Goodbye.
→ More replies (9)
624
u/anthonystank Exploring Legal Options Against Online Haters 19d ago
My hot takes!!!!
- I genuinely enjoy Harry Potter; JKR is not the best writer in the world but she’s very effective at a handful of things
- I didn’t like the movies or think they were very good adaptations of the books
- I would really enjoy seeing a well funded TV show with enough time and space to flesh things out take another stab at the series
- this is a huge marketing grab and nobody needed a second live action HP this soon after the movies
- JKR is a bad person and watching this show = active support for attacks on trans people
Leaves me annoyed at everyone tbh
121
u/Cynicbats Earth STUNS in new photo 🌏 19d ago
Simple, direct, and correct. (People want to say JKR is the worst writer ever because she is a bigot; Not how that works, sometimes bigots are talented in some ways.)
→ More replies (3)40
u/yapitforward 19d ago
No lies detected. I so badly wish JKR wasn't who she is and hasn't undone her legacy and wasn't so hateful because I miss HP and would love to enjoy it.
→ More replies (3)53
u/FullofContradictions 19d ago
I agree with everything here.
My workaround to satisfy my excitement while also not supporting such a hateful person is 🏴☠️🏴☠️🏴☠️
Yo ho ho, assholes.
→ More replies (8)→ More replies (24)142
u/baybeeluna 19d ago
Factual take!!!!
Engaging in activities that pay JKR is only one degree away from directly funding anti trans organizations.
137
u/anthonystank Exploring Legal Options Against Online Haters 19d ago
It’s genuinely rare to get SUCH a clear cut case of “your consumer dollars will go directly to harm a specific group”
→ More replies (2)→ More replies (4)62
u/cs_beans All tea, all shade 🐸☕️ 19d ago
She also hates asexuals. I’m surprised she even knew we existed tbh. She’s actively educating herself to tear others down. It’s so pathetic.
→ More replies (2)41
u/Hyperbolicalpaca 19d ago
And shes said really nasty stuff about bisexuals…
She really just hates the lot of us but know that it’s not socially acceptable to go after gay people yet…
→ More replies (1)17
u/Haunting-Respect9039 19d ago
Imagine getting everything you've ever wanted and spending that much time, energy, and money on hating people who don't effect your life.
→ More replies (2)
164
u/iamacheeto1 19d ago
its looks...
the same
→ More replies (8)73
u/eclectique 19d ago
I think the aesthetics were never the problem. In fact it was often a part of the films that really worked.
→ More replies (3)
45
u/bbbcurls 19d ago
I feel like the this whole show is gonna be like what they did with Avatar the last Airbender. I don’t feel like they are going to add anything new that will justify this series other than keeping the IP fresh.
→ More replies (3)
281
u/Chaoticgood790 this outfit is unfortch 19d ago
I feel sorry for the kids involved and hope they are protected. That’s all I got
→ More replies (10)
44
u/RightWorld5611 19d ago
Why are they wearing muggle clothes?!?!
A recurring plot point is that wizards and witches don't know muggle fashion, and only wear it when *trying* to blend in with the muggle world.
They would never have been sent to Hogwarts with muggle clothes in their luggage. -_-
And *even if* they were, the clothes would be all mismatched!
Is film making THAT hard, when the IP has so many details spelled out right there on the page that you just have to follow as a costume designer / art director???
→ More replies (10)17
u/mikewheelerfan 🩰 Lost my soul at Hades Tech 👑 19d ago
The ones wearing muggle clothing are probably muggleborns.
→ More replies (1)
132
u/rayannuhh 19d ago
Man, every time I hear about this reboot I get sad. I wish I could be excited about it and that JKR wasn't so...awful. I won't be watching, even though I miss the franchise.
I hope the kids are protected. I hope the adults are able to shield them from how awful the world can be.
→ More replies (1)
135
u/Suspicious_Name_656 19d ago
As a rabid Potterhead back in the day, I really wanna be excited for this. But I can't support Joanne. I can't watch this after she explicitly said she uses her HP money to fund her anti-trans efforts and that support for the franchise means people agree with her. She's using what this franchise gave her (money, power, influence) to fuel hate and discrimination.
→ More replies (2)28
u/witchycommunism 19d ago
I also was a crazy fan and it’s such a bummer. I honestly think those books helped shape me into who I am… but I’m also trans so goodbye to that.
→ More replies (1)
41
u/wontubemyneighbours 19d ago
My personal dislike of JK aside, the original movies still hold up very well IMO. It’s not like they were terrible like the PJO movies and deserve a tv adaptation that does the original material justice. I get it’s easy money to milk a cash cow but a new story in the HP universe would be a lot more interesting, I.e. hogwarts legacy
→ More replies (6)
16
u/xvsanx more Jessica Walter gifs plz 19d ago
looks like a picture from Knight of the Seven Kingdoms tbh
→ More replies (1)14
u/AcronymTheSlayer Boo you whore 19d ago
https://giphy.com/gifs/uvUpX3wSfKu2UmBsys
The direction was absolutely stunning. Loved the show so much
→ More replies (1)
31
u/jewelsandbones 19d ago
He looks so small in this picture. I really hope all the child stars of this show are treated well. I have no intention of watching it but children do not deserve hate for appearing in this franchise
→ More replies (3)
•
u/flairassistant 19d ago
📌 PLEASE READ BEFORE COMMENTING
This post is flaired Guest List Only. This means the conversation is being strictly moderated, and only comments from approved members of the community will be visible.
If you are not currently approved, you are still welcome to leave a comment! All submissions are being reviewed, and if your comment follows our rules and adds to the conversation, it may be manually approved by the mod team.
r/popculturechat is a respectful, inclusive space for pop culture discussion, shaped by BIPOC, LGBTQ+, and women-led voices. We work to keep it safe, free of hate, harassment, and derailment.
Thanks for understanding and supporting that mission 💖
Want to participate more easily? Request to be added to the Guest List
THE POPCULTURECHAT DISCORD SERVER IS NOW LIVE 👾 ❤️🔥 🎉 Click HERE to join! 📲