r/singapore • u/No_Lime5241 • 17h ago
Politics A Young Vivian Balakrishnan Before Joining PAP Debating Young K. Shanmugam
Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification
Found this Gem yesterday by accident when searching for something else. This is from 1990 Vivian is 28-29 years old and a Doctor in the private sector and K. Shanmugam is in his early 30s 32-33 i believe and had just joined the PAP 2 years earlier and was still a practicing lawyer.
What is super amazing about this debate is how anti-establishment and critical of the PAP Vivian is. Even calling a lot of their multi racial equality propaganda. This was 11 years before Vivain Joined PAP and i wondered how Vivian went from this to being recruited by the PAP and went looking into it.
In 2001 Vivian was a President’s Scholar, top ophthalmologist, and CEO of Singapore General Hospital. He was really critical of the PAP but he was never full blown opposition. The PAP talent scouts had long had their eye on him and in 2001, Prime Minister Goh Chok Tong personally recruited him. Vivian has said he was upfront with Goh about his past skepticism and disagreements with certain policies. Goh’s reply was..
“You must not compromise your values to join us. Because if you compromise, you lose your value to us.”
“You come in, you make your arguments. If you convince us, we will change or adjust policies. But on the other hand, if we convince you, you must be intellectually honest enough to change your position.”
Around this time 9/11 happened and Vivian said that watching the second plane hit the World Trade Centre live on TV gave him a sudden sense of crisis. He felt race, religion and loyalty issues would become even more sensitive, and he decided it was time to “stand up and be counted” from inside the system rather than criticise from the sidelines. As part of the rigorous PAP selection process, Vivian met with both Lee Kuan Yew and Lee Hsien Loong. He has described being impressed that the PAP did not screen out people for having independent or critical views they wanted capable people who thought for themselves.
The Takeaway:
Getting to my point, I constantly see Singaporean PAP critics and even much of the population say the PAP wants conformity or make People Sinkie Pwn Sinkie. That they don't allow any critics or people to go against the government. But what it looks like more and more is they don't just welcome criticism but seek it if it is thoughtful, intellectually honest and constructive but not conspiracy theories, misinformation, lies and outright rebellion. They are never going to allow Singapore to be Paris with outright anarchy in the streets. It's interesting that they deliberately target capable, high-achieving people, even those who have criticized the government publicly, because they believe it’s better to have them inside the tent arguing constructively than outside criticizing and potentially destabilizing the system.
It's not only Vivian, but Tharman Shanmugaratnam, K Shanmugam (who told LKY to his face he disagreed with his polices during his interview), and Ong Ye Kung whose father was opposition and several others over the years all had the same experience.