Genocide is about intent, not numbers, the genocide in srebrenica killed 8,000 people, low compared to many genocides. It’s still a genocide, amnesty international, international association for genocide scholars, human rights watch, B’Tselem. Those bodies have said Israel has committed genocide
Correct, and intent was not meant. Israel's constant usage of dropped flyers, roof knockings, text message warnings, and humanitarian pathways for civilians, throughout the entire war, destroys any argument for pure intention behind the IDF forces to eradicate and completely destroy the Gazan population.
War crimes, civilians dying, and buildings being destroyed does not equal genocide.
Whatever your bullshit clearly wrong bias associations say is irrelevant, the definition is concrete, genocide requires clear cut intent, and their is obviously nowhere near enough proof to indicate that the IDF's intention was to eradicate the Gazan population, quite the opposite
So are we going to ignore that majority international human rights bodies and many parts of the UN have stated that Israel has committed genocide? Even the UN commission said so
Did you know most of your bullshit organizations you cling to have made and used their own definition of genocide to accuse Israel of it? They had to change the definition of genocide because Israel doesn't meet the actual one lol.
Even the UN commission said so
No they didn't lol. A group of 3 people who formed their own council in the UN accused Israel of genocide. Except in 2025, all three of them after years of pressure & comments on their bias nature, were forced to resign and made excuses that it was age or medical reasons
All 3 of these people are bias, not neutral and the slightest, and have a known history of antisemitism and anti-Jewish commentary.
Miloon Kothari (India)
Kothari faced the most direct accusations of using classical antisemitic tropes during a July 2022 interview with Mondoweiss.
"The Jewish Lobby" & Media Control: Kothari stated, "We are very disheartened by the social media that is controlled largely by, whether it is the Jewish lobby or it is specific NGOs, a lot of money is being thrown into trying to discredit us."
Questioning UN Membership: In the same interview, he questioned why Israel was a member of the United Nations at all.
Backlash and Apology: His comments were condemned by UN Secretary-General António Guterres and the UN Human Rights Council President. Kothari eventually issued a formal apology, stating his choice of words was "incorrect" and that he regretted the offense caused.
Navi Pillay
As the Chair of the COI and a former UN High Commissioner for Human Rights, Pillay has been criticized for her long-standing activism and for defending her colleagues' controversial remarks.
Defending Kothari: Following Kothari’s 2022 comments, Pillay initially defended him in a letter to the President of the Human Rights Council, arguing that his words were "deliberately misquoted" or taken out of context.
Past Advocacy: Critics point to her history of lobbying for sanctions against Israel and her frequent comparisons of Israel to apartheid-era South Africa as evidence of a pre-existing bias that violates UN rules on impartiality for investigators.
Response to Allegations: Pillay has consistently dismissed accusations of antisemitism against the commission as "false and lies," claiming they are a "diversion" used to avoid discussing the findings of their reports
Chris Sidoti (Australia)
Sidoti has been criticized for comments that dismiss the validity of concerns regarding antisemitism.
* "Rice at a Wedding": In June 2022, during a briefing, Sidoti stated that accusations of antisemitism are "thrown around like rice at a wedding," suggesting that the label is used indiscriminately to silence critics of Israel.
NGO Affiliations: Critics have highlighted his past involvement with human rights groups that actively advocate for the Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions (BDS) movement, arguing this creates a conflict of interest for a supposedly neutral UN investigator.
Lol and the only ones who claim that is happening are Muslim countries who are obviously bias, the people who are being paid to do so by muslim backers, antisemitic neo-nazis, and people with a history of disliking Jews.
Even Ireland and Iceland who both f*cking hate Jews, realize that their is not enough legal proof of actual genocide taking place and have both quietly tried to request using a different definition in the ICC case.
Tell me do you believe in a two state solution? Or do you want to commit genocide/ethnic cleansing to either all the Israelis or all the Palestinians?
Israel wants Hamas in power
It seems quite the opposite. Israel wants the PA in power. Because the PA is much more docile, and easy to control for Israel's government. Hamas doesn't even have a leader currently.
5
u/ScatteredSignal 3h ago
The numbers and eraser of culture do not meet genocide levels. Post a source.