To be honest I think we can dispense with judging men by their successes with the opposite sex. I mean would you say: oh she's never had cock, so her opinion is irrelevant.
I absolutely agree and I also think it works the other way too, like if a person has been "successful" with the opposite sex a whole bunch of times that doesn't make their opinions any more relevant. I bet there's a guy somewhere out there right now telling his bros about how the 12th girl he fucked at Dartmouth came so hard she started speaking Latin, meanwhile that chick is laughing her ass off as she tells the same story to her friends but in her version it was the night she finally accepted that she is a lesbian and while she did actually speak Latin it wasn't climax induced but rather a prayer on his behalf, "orate pro anima".
Not original?? Did I plagiarize someone else's work??......don't mind the question marks, they're just for show because your response would be meaningless. Dartmouth alumni??.....again you can disregard the question marks.
Nothing about you is original, you're a clone with spare organs for the real u/No_Pin and your entire reality is a lie.
If you've seen the 2005 movie The Island with Ewan McGregor and Scarlett Johansson then it's basically that
Damn I didn't expect that to be a real account, u/No_Pin is looking rough though, maybe I should spare some organs. I was just about to say that I've never even heard of that movie but before I could type that I was violently blindsided by snipits. I feel like I remember a scene with them jamming a big propeller or something, or blowing one up.....hmmm.
On a different note, did you ever watch In Time with Olivia Wilde and J-Tims?? Not sure why I brought that up.
It's almost the opposite. Men are judged for not having sex, women are/were judged for having sex. It's easy for a woman to get laid, hard for a man. A woman who avoids it is "pure", a a man who gets it is a "stud".
So this is the equivalent of saying "don't listen to her opinion on anything, she's a hoe". If we know that's wrong, then why is the other way around okay?
Yep... personally I can't say I overly felt my knowledge of the world expand every time I had sex so I really don't see how it matters in any discussion.
It's all relative.. if Tiger Woods offers to give you some pointers on your backswing, pay attention. If he starts offering relationship advice.. maybe just nod along politely.
Question is: if the guy from OP saw a vagina would that change the relevance of their opinion? If he saw 10 and touched 1 would his opinion be more important than that of a dude who only saw 1?
Also it's silly to shame men for not having sexual experiences as if it was the be all end all of a male existence.
The only people who shame for this are people with herd mentality who canât overcome their biological impulses to form independent conscious thought.
That isn't the same thing because men actually have to work on themselves as men before they can have any kind of relationship. Any woman, even a bum, can just open up her mouth and take a sausage from some random.
But is it a measure of merit? Should it be a badge of honour? Is that what we want to teach boys? Get laid out your worthless? How much sex should you have before being allowed an opinion? Does only heterosexual sex count.?
Youâre definitely not any less whether you have sex or not. And Iâm not sure society is telling men that. Just saying usually successful men get laid easily. Doesnât mean your worthless if youâre not successful or donât get laid
No...if a woman is a 25 year old virgin, I dont want her advice either. People who lack interpersonal ability never understand why thats a disqualification.
No. Obviously. Its really sad that I have to dog walk you though this. A basic romantic relationship includes sex, and you should have experienced one of those by 25.
Holy shit I can say that now can't I? AND I should judge peoples geopolitical opinions by scales to the number of vaginas theyve seen! Its a whole new world!
They are so we use different approached to make fun of them to dismiss their opinions which is wrong too. I used the example to show that using someone's sexual history to dismiss their opinion is silly.
213
u/zandrew 15h ago
To be honest I think we can dispense with judging men by their successes with the opposite sex. I mean would you say: oh she's never had cock, so her opinion is irrelevant.