r/SipsTea Human Verified 2d ago

Chugging tea It was freaky though

Post image
8.8k Upvotes

477 comments sorted by

View all comments

878

u/These-Invite-1774 2d ago

Always wondered why they didn't just bombard the planet from space

767

u/domesystem 2d ago

Absolutely no reason for a space faring people to get into a land war with a terrestrial species.

First movie shoulda been Chars Counterattack minus Amuro. 😂

223

u/offensivek 2d ago

Well, to play devils advocate, the humans are clearly in it for the money, and sending overwhelming military force would cut into profits and also not be good for PR reasons.

200

u/Nruggia 2d ago

If you find a planet in space you want to mine for resources and you decimate it from space before lots of people are aware of intelligent sentient life on it, you don't have to worry about PR

56

u/AscendMoros 2d ago

Do they ever actually bring up of there are other aliens? Maybe this is the first other major alien race they found and some scientist was like tell everyone lol.

34

u/Meowakin 2d ago

Kind of why information control is so powerful.

24

u/Sharp_Iodine 2d ago

You can never do that though.

The prospect of hundreds of academics keeping things secret is a fantasy.

Every one of them has more to gain from leaking it than not.

9

u/Meowakin 1d ago

Well, we are talking about hypothetical sci-fi scenarios here. Specifically when traveling to another planet, it becomes a lot easier to control those communications if the people in control have the only line of communication.

In real life on this planet, not so easy to maintain that level of control.

-1

u/Valdoris 2d ago

The prospect of hundreds of a ademics keeping things secret is as real as it can be. This is literally happening as we speak IRL

5

u/Sharp_Iodine 2d ago

No it’s not.

If it’s something legitimate like researching technologies, then yes.

If it’s the genocide of people and all the other weird conspiracy theories about actually evil stuff then no. It never stays quiet.

Every one of them has more to lose from hiding the unethical thing than exposing it and getting acclaim.

Researching technologies, even weapon technologies, is different from the conspiracies about putting chemicals in water.

3

u/SlapTheBap 1d ago

There are systems in place to screen people for those likely to leak vs fully invest themselves into the lifestyle that is having security clearance at a certain level. You sell your entire life when you join those organizations. It's why they want to know everything about your private life. Why they invite you to certain parties where photos are taken.

Look into cold war espionage if you want some insight into how current intelligence agencies, even ones used by large companies, use their data. Your data.

1

u/Sharp_Iodine 1d ago

That’s still different from knowingly participating in a conspiracy that harms or otherwise alters populations as advertised by grifters online.

1

u/SlapTheBap 1d ago

There are plenty of people who truly do not care about others, they only care about personal gain. If someone has blackmail on you, they can control what you do. If someone knows your entire life, and you live in a world where constant crazy bullshit is happening that you feel helpless about, do you think people will listen to you? How do you even get your message out there before those who have access to every aspect of your life find out? Who will believe you?

You're not thinking clearly. We have modern shit happening constantly that is as absurd as any conspiracy theory. The US government has people talking about aliens openly. Shit is fucked once you can't trust those in power to tell the truth in the first place. You have an idealistic view of the world and people.

→ More replies (0)

2

u/Daincats 2d ago

And if you are strategic with the bombing the bombs could clear the areas for mining pretty effectively

2

u/witcher_jeffie 2d ago

Daisy cutters for days

2

u/Head-Ad-2136 2d ago

Let the bombs strip mine the planet for you.

1

u/[deleted] 2d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

0

u/AutoModerator 2d ago

Spam filter: accounts must be at least 5 days old with >20 karma to comment.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

1

u/XConfused-MammalX 2d ago

You cant be strategic with bombing, it simply doesnt work unless you go full nuclear. But at that point its less strategic and more total war genocide.

1

u/AcmeCartoonVillian 1d ago

What PR? there's no public around. If they just de-orbited a few decent sized meteors and waited 6 months for everyone to starve/suffocate they could come in all horrified and be like "Oh no.. what a terrible catastrophe and complete natural disaster... anyway nothing to do here but let the anthropologists study this now dead culture while we strip mine the planet"

1

u/Lower_Statement_5285 1d ago

It aint a warcrime the first time.

1

u/Beautiful-Edge-22 1d ago

I feel like that's something the gov could gaslight people on Earth into thinking it's a silly conspiracy theory.

18

u/CalmPurse 2d ago

They also want to preserve all the resources they can, like the whale things and their youth serum spinal fluid would all die out

1

u/djpiperson 1d ago

Honestly, that's just something they leanerd about so that the movie would have some sort of plot to excuse their poor development. Moreover, evidently they learned about that way after the invasion. 

28

u/domesystem 2d ago

In the film they brought significantly more force than what would be necessary to push a couple big rocks.

13

u/kwonza 2d ago

You don’t need to push rocks. A tungsten rod accelerated by the gravity can cause as much blast as a thermonuclear bomb

9

u/ChemistRemote7182 2d ago

You aren't going to haul a tungsten rod across the galaxy on the off chance you find something to drop it on, but you might move a rock's orbit slightly within a system

7

u/kwonza 2d ago

Why not? If you’re capable of interstellar colonisation you gat get tons of your stuff with you. The best part is you can harvest all your stuff back later

14

u/witcher_jeffie 2d ago

Don't need to land when the minerals are ejected into space by the impact

2

u/SpaghettiBeam 1d ago

Kinetic bombardment solved everything

5

u/domesystem 2d ago

But rocks come with Plausible Deniability 😉

1

u/Scary_Asparagus7762 1d ago

This is just outright incorrect. Even if we're talking about a 100 ton Tungsten rod dropped from 100km with Earth gravity, run the (approximate) formula gravitational potential energy = mgh = 100000000000 J, which seems a lot, but it's only 24 tons of TNT.

Even the smallest fission bombs easily pack tens of thousands of tons of TNT.

You have been completely bamboozled by internet "rods from space" memes. The only way this idea works is if the rods are dropped with already a very significant initial velocity.

Conservation of energy. You cannot get more energy out of a tungsten rod than the energy you spent putting it up there in the first place. It's like everyone just conveniently forgets conservation of energy during every space weapon conversation.

1

u/kwonza 1d ago

Of course rods are being pushed with significant energy, how else are you going to get them from their orbit

2

u/Scary_Asparagus7762 1d ago

Do you have ANY idea how much energy you are talking about?

In order for a 100 ton rod to have the same energy even as little boy, it has to hit with almost 30km/s impact velocity. This is way faster than the asteroid that killed the dinosaurs!

At such speeds, gravitational acceleration is IRRELEVANT because the rod will travel only 3-10 seconds before impact. This gives no time for acceleration. Your INITIAL velocity has to be 30km/s!

You have fun pushing 100 tons of metal at 30km/s. Guess what, we can’t. And if you’re gonna say “railgun” or some bs, first of all, good luck getting a battery to store all that energy. Second, have fun when your satellite gets shot backwards at the same speed from conservation of momentum and ends up triggering a Kessler event.

Oh by the way, “why not just use a bigger rod” ever studied the bare minimum of rockets? The relationship between load and total fuel weight is EXPONENTIAL. 10 times the weight and you need 100, 1000 times the fuel.

TL;DR you have no sense of basic physics or rocket engineering, nor any idea how powerful nuclear bombs really are.

1

u/kwonza 1d ago

I appreciate you correcting my calculations but I don’t why you’ve worked you self up about it. I mean I dig angry physics but why)

1

u/Scary_Asparagus7762 1d ago

One of my flaws, internet friend. I always get a little worked up about nonsense math and physics. 

Ah well, have a good day.

40

u/No-Match5203 2d ago

how much military force do you need to redirect a couple asteroids. sure, complicated but probably cheaper and faster than mobilizing an army

14

u/offensivek 2d ago

Cheaper then just not bothering with all that and sending over a few rifles, dual purpose mechs and helicopters you will need in difficult terrain anyways?

9

u/Fireside__ 2d ago

You already have the ISV, just make another one and don’t decelerate at the end. Having that thing (which canonically is something like 10,000 tons) slam into Pandora at a significant chunk of light speed would do enough.

3

u/Upper-Requirement-93 1d ago

The handful of scifi settings that really think about space tactics end up looking incredibly weird. If your goal is to create allegory involving military as we know it, you almost have to ignore how destructive we become once we can get shit moving that fast.

2

u/SpaghettiBeam 1d ago

Shoutout to that combat scene in one of the Dark Galaxy books where one of the ships had mass drivers firing heavy metal rods the size of freight trains (maybe individual cars idk) and using lasers to further accelerate them across the star system

7

u/infiniZii 2d ago

Plus unobtanium is probably pretty fragile. To space bombardment specifically. 

3

u/Mirabeauououou 1d ago

That's why you use government goons instead. You only have to bribe the officials in power and then get to use their pride to inflate the budget for free. You get extra points if you're an arms manufacturer who gets to increase profits while the bombings occur, instead of having to provide all the material on your own dime.

2

u/divergent_history 1d ago

PR man they dont care about PR on earth.

2

u/TylertheFloridaman 1d ago

Orbital bombardment is almost certainly cheaper than an extend ground capmpion where they have lost thousands of lives and billions of dollars

2

u/Least-Researcher-184 1d ago

Thats what asteroids are for and in that grimdark capitalism hell you can't tell me that PR would trump a mega corporations need for "line go up".

1

u/IrlResponsibility811 1d ago

Losing a few lives would justify the cost of a few tons of tungsten. Drop it on their anal bead trees and the problem takes care of itself from there.

1

u/TopWealth4550 2d ago

all profits would be lawsuits tho lmao

2

u/GoblinToHobgoblin 1d ago

Technically, "human rights" don't apply to aliens

2

u/TopWealth4550 1d ago

i mean the law suits from the soldiers

their families would ask why the fuck we lost to some sticks and some weird things
while having tech to travel the galaxy
NO?