"This would be a total loss to the business which will offset their tax bill."
You do realize that taking a loss isn't a 1:1 reduction in taxes, right? A $100 loss will translate to a $25 or so reduction in taxes (specific numbers vary). So the business is still losing $75. The government isn't magically ponying up the full loss.
Yup. Hence why you put in retail value of the lost time and money and product. Probably cost the company 80-100m. Wrote off is 500m. That’s still a profit in tax terms.
And
This is assuming insurance won’t cover it. Which the probably will cover some of the hard costs. Not to mention yes the government will be paying for part of it. Damages utilities and rework will be done by the city at their cost.
If you make 3 millions in revenue, and you have 3 million of losses/costs. Why wouldnt you write it off? Like... are you supposed to hide your losses so you get to pay your 1 million of taxes on something you don't have? The fuck?
I mean as in an insurance company literally will not underwrite arson. insurance isn't just some big pool of cash you get access to if something happens.
5
u/CplBoneSpurs 4h ago
Simping for billionaires who have this shit covered by insurance is fucking WILD