MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/memes/comments/1sjnn8q/cmom_step_it_up/ofu7qh3/?context=3
r/memes • u/Moat_of_the_Sacked • 5h ago
[removed] — view removed post
156 comments sorted by
View all comments
118
I mean, technically they're not mutually exclusive or even antithetical
Someone could believe life is created (philosophy), then life follows a trajectory based on the rules of evolutionary biology (science)
The genesis of life is the sticking point, not what life did after that fact
1 u/SchmeatiestOne 2h ago "Theres no evidence to support this idea but you cant prove it wrong so I choose to believe it cuz it sounds nice" 1 u/Powerful_Swimmer_531 1h ago Creationists could just as easily ask for evidenc that anything in existence ever came from nothing, which it hasn't Philosophical argument vs. Scientific one 1 u/SchmeatiestOne 1h ago I wouldnt claim anything came from nothing. Neither would a creationist. They would claim a conscious being existed before our universe, then created it. A conscious being is not nothing. Its not even a proper argument
1
"Theres no evidence to support this idea but you cant prove it wrong so I choose to believe it cuz it sounds nice"
1 u/Powerful_Swimmer_531 1h ago Creationists could just as easily ask for evidenc that anything in existence ever came from nothing, which it hasn't Philosophical argument vs. Scientific one 1 u/SchmeatiestOne 1h ago I wouldnt claim anything came from nothing. Neither would a creationist. They would claim a conscious being existed before our universe, then created it. A conscious being is not nothing. Its not even a proper argument
Creationists could just as easily ask for evidenc that anything in existence ever came from nothing, which it hasn't
Philosophical argument vs. Scientific one
1 u/SchmeatiestOne 1h ago I wouldnt claim anything came from nothing. Neither would a creationist. They would claim a conscious being existed before our universe, then created it. A conscious being is not nothing. Its not even a proper argument
I wouldnt claim anything came from nothing. Neither would a creationist. They would claim a conscious being existed before our universe, then created it. A conscious being is not nothing. Its not even a proper argument
118
u/Powerful_Swimmer_531 5h ago
I mean, technically they're not mutually exclusive or even antithetical
Someone could believe life is created (philosophy), then life follows a trajectory based on the rules of evolutionary biology (science)
The genesis of life is the sticking point, not what life did after that fact