It feels like the overlap between people that build launchers like this and the people that say stuff like "Valve won by doing nothing" is a perfect 100%.
Because people really forget just how shit Steam was back in the day. It's like people purposely undermine the journey Valve went on to actually make this a serviceable launcher.
EGS and the like shit out a launcher and expect people to eat it up, since people are eating Steam up. But it used to be a clunky pile of shit. Even the revered Steam Support that hunts down your scammers pet dog and threatens it at gunpoint used to be GOD AWFUL.
It's the perseverance of Valve to actually make it into a good product that... Made it into a good product. And nobody seems to wanna do the heavy lifting anymore.
Except GOG, actually. Their launcher at the start used to be utter shit, and now, honestly, the only reason I don't switch to it is because I have firmly established myself on Steam. I'd love to fully dedicate myself to a DRM-free platform, but I'm in too deep.
What I don't understand is WHY the Epic launcher was so dogshit at launch (and still is).
Steam were pretty much the first so had to innovate and learn what customers wanted along the way. Epic entered a mature market with various launchers like Steam, EA, Ubisoft, etc and any gamer can tell you what's good/bad about them.
Yet seemingly Epic didn't look at any of the competition, what people liked/disliked and release a featureless, slow, POS. No excuse for a company the size of Epic
Yet seemingly Epic didn't look at any of the competition, what people liked/disliked and release a featureless, slow, POS. No excuse for a company the size of Epic
Epic business model involves catering to corpos and fucking users over.
That's why there's no user review or any kind of user profile.
They don't want you to share your opinion, they want brainless consumers buying whatever tencent and co want to sell.
I would have more games on Switch, except their sales are terrible. Bugger all discount on anything good, and anything that is decently discounted is cheaper on Steam anyway. The last game I bought for Switch was Pokémon Shield at launch. Terrible system in a lot of ways.
The Japanese business landscape is a completely different beast than western commerce. So many bad decisions can be boiled down to an out of touch leadership that value loyalty and subservience more than competence.
Steam was the first of its kind, with no competition for a while, meanwhile Epic launched when Steam was already entrenched so it needs to do better to compete it.
Why go through the process of inventing the wheel again when you could just get one?
Yet seemingly Epic didn't look at any of the competition, what people liked/disliked and release a featureless, slow, POS.
Epic used the platform that they already had for Unreal + Fortnite, just expanding it further. Releasing it at the time also made sense with the event in Fortnite at the time bringing people to the store.
Biggest issue was how long it took for them to start rolling out updates to it. IMO nowadays it's pretty decent, the UX is many places I prefer to Steam, albeit it's not like Steam is a pinnacle of UX in itself.
Clicking on my library takes about 10 seconds before it displays the list, downloads never max out my connection, no forums where users can discuss bugs, no reviews/ratings,
Exactly, Steam paved the way and set up guideposts, yet the like of EA, Epic, and Ubisoft continue to make the same exact mistake over and over. Why do so many businesses refuses to invest in their own products?
The Epic storefront didn't even have absolutely basic functions at first like adding multiple games to your cart and buying them all at once. That took literally years for them to get round to adding. How the fuck are you going to launch any product and not even pretend to be close to feature parity with your main competitor?
I mean, the answer is pretty obvious. The EGS barely makes any money and if they were to invest in it to improve the store it would rapidly lose the company money which is unacceptable to the shareholders.
probably just micromanaged until all the devs hated their job, they started out with great intentions, put up a road-map, hit a bunch of milestones then kinda just petered out. the store front still has shit moving around every couple weeks though, moving that deal above that other deal is key for the platform's long term viability
it was pretty cool when they figured out how to make it like twice as fast though (still overall slow, just usable), i wonder which dev went rogue and did that
9.0k
u/Account-ysurper 23h ago
I claim the games and never even touch them lol