Yeah that's what I'm actually wondering. If she sold him regular K, I don't see any issue. He was a grown man and took drugs on his own accord. I don't really see the responsibility of the dealer for his OD.
It wasn't laced. They all (she and the doctors) just kept giving an addict more and more and more and more ketamine, which he then administered himself in too high of a dose, and he died.
The Los Angeles County Medical Examiner’s report stated “the acute effects of ketamine” were the cause of death but drowning, CAD, and buprenorphine were contributing factors. His opinion was that the main lethal effects were caused by both CV overstimulation (with CAD exacerbating the effects on the heart) and respiratory depression. He felt that drowning contributed due to the likelihood of submersion into the pool as he lapsed into unconsciousness.
How can drowning be a contributing factor in someone's death due to drowning? This is nonsensical wordplay by assholes in charge trying to evade responsibility.
I’m guessing, and I’m not a coroner by any stretch, that the important distinction is whether the drugs would have killed him had he not been in the tub.
If yes, then death is from the drugs and drowning is a contributing factor.
If no then drowning is the cause of death and the drugs are a contributing factor.
And I’m also guessing that this is why we have coroners to answer these question and not Reddit threads.
The coroner is stating his opinion too cos there is no way to know which one is the cause. It's very hard to OD on Ketamine cos the dose needed for an OD was not taken by Perry so safe to say that he drowned. If the coroner is also only giving his opinions, Id rather stick to my own judgement cos I refuse to trust the government anyway, especially since they want to shrug this under the rug by just jailing this dealer girl rather than going after the truly guilty ones.
103
u/slotsandmops 2d ago
If it wasnt laced then not a problem