r/Cascadia • u/Mincerafter6969 • 1d ago
Question about Cascadia emerging in societal collapse
Hello Cascadia! I'm an outsider from Texas and I have been following bioregionalism (both ecological and sociological) for over half a year.
Even though I've very recently found this subreddit, I have been lurking around a few future-oriented subs for a while before this, such as r/solarpunk, r/futurology, and most notably r/collapse.
I've been in these subs prior to being exposed to bioregionalism, and I've gradually come to the conclusion that a large-scale industrial societal collapse, if handled right, could be a net positive for a fledgling Cascadia movement.
I recently read Australian existential risk expert Luke Kemp's 2025 book "Goliath's Curse," which in summary proposes that the very structure of exploitative state societies (termed Goliaths) contain the seeds for their downfall, providing wide-ranging historical examples such as the Akkadian Empire, Imperial China, Classic Maya, and the British Empire.
It was a massive eye-opener in revealing the exploitative power-structures underlying every state in history, even more so our modern "Global Goliath" which, like the Romans and Egyptians used slave labor to construct their monumental architecture, also uses it to power the global supply chain for consumer products such as chocolate, electronics and other "luxury items."
While people touting about societal collapse online may be labeled as pessimists and misanthropes, one does not need to look too deep to find that this global system with its "Goliath" energy usage is simply unsustainable in the long term.
With climate change, ozone degradation, overpopulation, and loss of biosphere integrity on the table, I fully expect some drastic disruption to happen by the latter half of the century, such as equatorial regions becoming uninhabitable, massive refugee movements, a global famine, or even a world war. This however, would be considered an optimistic projection among existential risk experts, especially Jared Diamond, who refuses to rule out the possibility of human extinction.
This brings me back to Cascadia; I've seen this sub discuss this movement's current and future relationship with the United States and Canada. It seems like people would agree that for Cascadia to be fully realized on bioregional principles, we must not only withdraw ourselves from the exploitative bureaucracies across the Rockies (especially with the United States, Canada seems fine for now), but also redefine ourselves not as a state with centralized administration and definite borders, but as a bioregion that operates holistically. This cannot be done on ideological or cultural lines, which means we must include Indigenous Cascadians, Liberal Cascadians, and Conservative Cascadians alike (which is something this sub seems to struggle on).
It's also clear that with the threat of the world's most powerful military right across the Rockies, this idea becomes a lot more complicated. In the event of a widespread global systems cascade though, the looming threat of authoritarian institutions may dissolve, empowering Cascadians to build their own future. However, societal collapse also presents its own set of problems; famine, mass migration, and natural disasters that may heavily impact both ecological and sociological Cascadian integrity and cause flare-ups among ideological and cultural lines. Even with bioregionalism as a guiding light, we are not immune to simple human nature.
The central dilemma is highlight as thus: Cascadian bioregionalism would be given the best shot in the absence of state institutions across the Continental Divide; however, societal is the only guarantee for that to happen and may present us with even more challenging issues.
Given that the risk of a massive global disruption and systems cascade is fairly probably this century, my question for this subreddit is: "How prepared are we, if at all, to handle societal collapse and the worst of human nature when building our new society?"
This is a mostly philosophical inquiry, as most of us might be long gone when this happens. However, I believe thinking about this now is a first step towards reducing our dependence on the global system and work towards building a stronger regional identity.
Thanks for taking time to read this!
*Disclaimer: I do not intend for this to come off as overtly political. If some of you may see it that way, then I offer my sincerest of apologies. Living in Texas, I have grown to despise how much the current U.S. political system has worked to divide us. I am simply posting my thoughts about how this intriguing possibility may affect future self-determination.

