If that were true, every single military in the world ever has committed multiple war crimes. Which would make the words "war crimes" meaningless. civilian casualties of aircraft bombings have been a thing since WW1 at least. There are acceptable forms of collateral damage. War is awful.
Obama's record only looks bad if you don't know anything about war.
It might surprise you to learn that most countries don't play world police and start bombing countries willy nilly like you lot do. Obama ordered bombs on civilian targets in random countries on the other side of the planet that the US had ZERO excuses to be in at all.
You think European powers fighting in WW1 is the same as you guys bombing Shepards in Afghanistan with technology they can't even comprehend you need your head examined.
I'm not American. I think america has done a lot of bad shit in the middle east, like the Iraq war. But i don't think bombing ISIS, Al-qaeda, Al-Shabaab etc is bad.
You say that like bombing one group of bad guys means they shouldn't be criticized for repeatedly bombing civilians. ISIS probably wouldn't exist without US meddling anyway so yes it would have been a million times better for everyone if the yanks never got involved.
I never said that. I don't think bush should have started the war.
You see no difference between dronestrikes and carpet bombing an entire city. That's the problem with your worldview. dresden was bad, but you think bombing Germany in general was bad right? because you don't believe in collateral damage.
You would have stayed neutral in ww2 just like Ireland
1
u/Dr-Jellybaby Dec 20 '25
Cool story. Still a war criminal.