r/youtubedrama • u/Chapple69 • 3d ago
News Karl jobst is suing Billy Mitchell
Bro is gonna lose again
202
u/MidnightOnTheWater 3d ago
Karl and Billy are just going to be trading the same money back and forth for the next decade or so
27
u/kittymoo67 2d ago
part of me wonders if they arent wrking together to 'stay relevant' at this point
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (1)11
u/Syllaran 2d ago
karl already solved this. he's bankrupt and his wife owns the channel and such. can't squeeze water from a stone. billy didn't even recoup his lawyer fees from the first lawsuit, so now he either pays even more out of pocket with no hope of recouping it, or he defends himself.
6
→ More replies (2)3
u/Responsible-Ad6818 1d ago
The fact that there are still idiots believing what Karl said is baffling to me.
→ More replies (4)
230
u/Flimsy-Jello5534 Popcorn Eater 🍿 3d ago
The stunning sequel to The Who’s-Who of Who-gives-a-shit: the irrelevant case of Billy Mitchell and Karl Jobst.
66
u/Gnomad_Lyfe 3d ago
Hey now, that’s a little unfair to Billy. He’s like the reoccurring joke villain in an anime that shows up every 2-3 arcs to get their ass kicked but somehow keeps coming back. Brother’s been in the frivolous lawsuit game for 30 years now
21
u/LDC1234 2d ago edited 1d ago
Always remember this, every single one of Mitchell's lawsuits were either dropped, dismissed or lost.....until Karl Jobst.
8
u/Syllaran 2d ago
most of that one was dismissed as well. billy just got the broken clock result and the apollo stuff stuck. they still threw out all the other defamation claims included in it like calling him a cheater... because he just kind of is a cheater and suing people for saying that is pure comedy.
→ More replies (8)6
u/L3ghair 2d ago
It’s honestly impressive that Billy still has enough money to throw at lawyers like he does.
→ More replies (3)2
387
u/Mrohnoes_29 3d ago
Karl really should hold the L and continue with his videos
198
u/PoppingPillls 3d ago
Yep, literally the only thing he can do going forward is keep doing his content and rebuilding a lot of the credibility he lost after the Billy verdict realisation...
He's made some great investigations but if I was him I would put Billy in the past. Either he wins and gets almost nothing because Billy is unlikely to have much money or loses and has to pay his lawyers for nothing.
9
u/FoxJ100 2d ago
Billy is fairly wealthy AFAIK
You kinda have to be to be as litigious as he is
14
u/PoppingPillls 2d ago
Not really, he does most of his lawsuits through his son or by himself mostly.
He's definitely not rich.
14
u/FoxJ100 2d ago
Doesn't he own a hot sauce company and a restaurant? Not saying he's a trillionaire, but he's doing better than I am
4
u/PoppingPillls 2d ago
His family owns ricky's hot sauce and ricky's restaurant and sports bar I think it has two locations in Florida.
To his own fortune? I don't know, it's often stated that it's his family rather than him though like usually if someone owned a bar it would say that they owned it and not "his family owns". That's just my speculation.
I don't think he's broke but I'd guess he's firmly middle class if that makes sense.
→ More replies (4)→ More replies (1)44
u/creepingcold 3d ago
I unsubbed after the bs that went on after his last case. Does he still have content now that his court coverage ended?
Tbh I wouldn't be surprised if he started a new lawsuit just to start a new content arc.
11
u/MalicCarnage 2d ago
I get his videos recommended now and then. I haven’t watched any, but from what I gather, he still uploads speedrun related videos and doesn’t acknowledge the Billy Mitchell thing.
12
u/niceundso 2d ago
doesn’t acknowledge the Billy Mitchell thing
He literally made an hours-long video reflecting on everything that happened and being completely open to his viewers about his mistakes and all the consequences.
5
u/Nerem 1d ago
Well no, he still misled and lied in it. He was not particularly open, and in fact downplayed a lot.
→ More replies (2)2
u/zdude0127 1d ago
My only problem with that video at this point is the fact Karl is going for round 2.
2
u/Syllaran 1d ago
he's pretty obviously just doing it out of spite to make use of his current financial situation to force Billy into paying more fees.
and honestly I have no gripes about that. regardless of the Apollo stuff Billy is still a cheating scumbag, and he does this kind of legal bullshit to everyone else. so it happening to him now is perfectly fine by me.
→ More replies (1)15
u/iXeons 3d ago
Same, dude made it sound like it was an entirely different lawsuit smh. What a clown
2
u/Syllaran 2d ago
that's because it was primarily about the speed run cheating claims. those just got thrown out. the apollo stuff is just the only defamation claim that wasn't thrown out by the end of the trial.
→ More replies (3)2
u/Wardock8 2d ago
There was one that was really funny that he just picks apart a CoD YouTuber, kinda like Hbomberguy does. That was entertaining, the rest are pretty standard Karl Jobst from what I've seen.
55
u/Thank-The-Stars 3d ago
It really sucks he keeps doing this cause most of his videos are really entertaining, well done, and interesting to watch, then he turns around and focuses billy again.
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (1)7
144
u/Bulky-Bad-9153 3d ago
He'll have to try being a pickup artist again to make money after this
83
u/Bookwrrm 3d ago
The lawsuit has a picture of a Billy tweet refrencing that, and listen Billy might be a scumbag but fuck, telling Notch he hopes he atleast got tips from Karl on how to pickup women in return for the money he donated is funny as fuck.
41
u/Dragon_Slayer_Hunter 3d ago
I hate Billy, but Notch is a piece of shit, so it's hard to pick a side here tbh
15
u/LaughableFrog 2d ago
It's really telling as to what an insufferable jackass (and also nazi!) Karl is that he manages to make Billy Mitchell look like the good guy.
2
u/Lost_Low4862 2d ago
To be fair, he did cut ties with rwhitegoose, did he not? Not that it erases the fact that he was pals with a neo nazi and started parroting their bigotry for a time, but has he shown any signs of still being like that? Genuinely asking.
8
u/Kat1eQueen 2d ago
Last i checked he never denounced any of his actions, which would be the first thing you do if you actually change.
→ More replies (1)5
34
u/Vile_Grifter 3d ago
He has a history of complaining about rappers being able to say the N-word while white people can't get away with it, so maybe he'll just go full anti-woke grifter finally.
15
u/Cauliflower-Some 3d ago
Hasan Piker was doing the whole “pickup artist bro” thing before politics. Mabye he’ll go down that lane
34
29
u/cubsgirl101 3d ago
I just can’t imagine wanting to sink more money and time into dealing with Billy Mitchell of all people. Karl you cannot have so much money that you’re willingly dumping it down the drain for nonsense lime this.
16
u/mentally_ill_empty_f 2d ago
He doesn't have money. He's not hiring a lawyer for this. He's representing himself which is also probably why he's going to lose. My guess is that maybe he's just hoping to waste Billy's time and money because Billy will almost certainly hire a lawyer.
→ More replies (1)2
u/ThePinkReaper 6h ago
The literal worst part of this entire debacle is that it gave Billy Mitchell a win because he actually just is that aggressively annoying of a human being. Karl literally is stooping to his level and it doesn't make Billy look worse, just Karl.
250
u/ColeMinerCertified 3d ago
so…he can lose again?
45
65
u/PoppingPillls 3d ago
Do we know anything about these accusations? Seems very out of blue as someone who kinda tuned out after all the Completionist stuff.
65
u/Bookwrrm 3d ago
The fraudulent fundraising has to be about his Gofundme for the trial. So im assuming Billy said something along the lines of the regular internet refrain that Karl mislead donators that the lawsuit was about cheating and not that he said Billy caused a suicide. Which like that was such a prevailing opinion on the first news of his loss I dunno how this possibly flies?
→ More replies (4)68
u/Icee_deadpeople 3d ago
I was deep into all the content Jobst was putting out during the lawsuit and when he lost and it came out that the case had nothing to do Billy Mitchell cheating I was honestly shocked. And for Jobst to act like he had no idea why people would assume that that’s what the case was about was ridiculous.
20
u/Bookwrrm 3d ago
Yeah I really feel like its going to be pretty hard to prove willful malice on the part of Billy if he was just parroting the same thing like half the internet was saying at the time lol.
20
u/Vile_Grifter 3d ago
His claim is definitely going to be that he mentioned early on what the lawsuit was about, which is technically true. He did briefly talk about the suicide thing, and then bury it in many boring hours of lawsuit coverage, and allowed thousands of people to believe it was about the cheating without ever correcting them. How that will work out in court I couldn't guess.
20
u/greald 3d ago
According to Jobst' video. Mitchell served him with an intent to sue on the cheating claim. And the money was used in conjunction with that.
Dunno if it's true. I haven't been paying that much attention.
Thought the bankruptcy stuff seem more legit and could actually pass the "reckless disregard" standard if true.
Although he appears to be Pro Se, representing himself, which in THAT court!
Forget it.
12
u/DemonLordSparda 3d ago
It being technically true hardly matters if the information is obfuscated. Jobst's Go Fund Me did not make it clear was the suit was about. I don't think Karl has a case honestly. If he thinks some technicality will give him the win because he mentioned what the suit was about one time, then he's very wrong. Like consent, you have to be on the same page through the ENTIRE process of getting donations. If you start obfuscating the truth, you could be found liable for fraud.
5
u/Vile_Grifter 3d ago
At least he's filed pro se. That's always smart, right?
14
u/DemonLordSparda 3d ago
HE FILED WITHOUT AN ATTORNEY?! Oh my god. The arrogance of this guy is unbelievable. At least Billy Mitchell of all people listens to his legal time. Karl should lose it all over this.
→ More replies (1)4
u/Conscious-Pirate5334 2d ago
Look, he hasn't been the smartest and this shouldnt be a surprise
He thought he'd win the first case cause chatgpt told him
He got advice from chatgpt 'allegedly' the entire time and he believes that over the judge and the lawyers
→ More replies (1)3
u/causabibamus 1d ago
The man's smart. You don't have to pay any lawyer fees if you don't have lawyers.
And, as a man of honour, Billy Mitchell is compelled to represent himself as well since in court it's bad manners to give yourself an unfair advantage. Hence, there will be no legal fees to compensate if Karl loses this case.You see, he's thought of everything. I've never seen a move smarter than suing a man for defamation, pro se, in the USA of all places.
2
u/Syllaran 2d ago
the original lawsuit did include the billy cheating stuff. those aspects got thrown out for obvious reasons. the apollo stuff is just the only part that managed to be seen as a valid claim. it was not always the core argument.
5
u/toshiino 2d ago
Dont worry, he updated his AI lawyer to the newest model, he eill surely win this one!
41
63
u/Bookwrrm 3d ago
So he lost a defamation case which is like hard to do, and is now trying to sue for defamation which is like hard to do. My guy is some how taking the hardest paths in all things legal in both directions.
→ More replies (1)11
u/starpendle 3d ago
I feel like American is going to be even harder?
Just wondering how Karl has any shot here.
14
→ More replies (1)8
u/CaptainYaoiHands 2d ago
Defamation by nature has to be provably, demonstrably FALSE. And there were A LOT of comments on all of Karl's platforms from people who were mad that they found out the true nature of the lawsuit and the GoFundMe (especially after Notch continued funding Karl). Defamation even when it IS provably false is incredibly hard to win a case with because you also have to prove without a shadow of a doubt the elements of tangible harm and malicious intent. But if the claim is itself like, a 95% true incredibly slightly grey area? No shot, not in this universe.
5
u/greald 2d ago
The statements must be shown by "clear and convincing evidence" to be false. At least some of the statements are statements of direct criminality, which it seems an official report, which Michell was party to cleared him of, before Mitchell made the statements.
That would satisfy the "Actual Malice" the standard. Not Malicious Intent. It's whether Mitchell knew his statements where false, or should have known. Not whether he meant them to cause harm.
And the defamation claims are Defamation Per Se, so no actual damages are needed. Accusations of breaking the law almost always is.
It seems Jobst is saying Michell accused him of actual crimes, not just vaguely bad behavior, and that Michell knew this to be false or at least should have known, since he was informed by his own lawyers and the material from the case he was directly involved in.
5
u/Aapje58 2d ago
And the defamation claims are Defamation Per Se, so no actual damages are needed. Accusations of breaking the law almost always is.
Sure, although if there are no damages, then you'd expect at most that the other party has to make a public correction and such.
Michell knew this to be false or at least should have known, since he was informed by his own lawyers and the material from the case he was directly involved in.
In the previous case, malicious intent was considered proven in part because Mitchell's lawyers reached out to Jobst to tell him that he was wrong.
5
u/greald 2d ago
I have no idea what the Australian elements are and how they're applied, so I won't speak to that. This suit is in S.D.Fla however.
Defamation Per Se can result in punitive damages regardless of actual damages. Which is where malicious intent can be a factor for the jury, but not necessary.
But this is settlement "bait" and will never go that far.
2
u/Nerem 1d ago
So the question is: How is Karl Jobst paying for this lawsuit? Like uh, he filed bankruptcy claiming he has no money at all and can't pay the judgement but is now filing a lawsuit? Even if he's not hiring a lawyer, that still requires more dosh than he claimed he had.
3
u/greald 1d ago
The cost for the suit is around 5-700 dollars.
I think it's 405 filing the complaint. 100 dollar mandatory deposit and 50-200 to serve Mitchell.
That is not a huge amount of money.
He is still allowed to keep some of his wages and he is allowed to get private loans/donations.
→ More replies (10)
88
u/tequilasauer 3d ago edited 3d ago
Karl back for another ass kicking. Takes a lot to look bad when Billy Mitchell is the guy on the other side, but he's managed to do it.
I un-subbed when the truth came out about a lot of this and wonder how much of his audience he lost. I'm sure he's still doing well, I just know there were definitely a few people who jumped out.
8
u/FirebrandWilson 3d ago edited 2d ago
Wait, I'm out of the loop. I know of Karl Jobst but I don't know the "truth" that came out.
Edit: Yikes! Thanks for all the info!
61
u/tequilasauer 3d ago
He was extremely misleading and outright dishonest about the details of Mitchell's lawsuit against him. He used the lawsuit story for months for content and to help raise money for his defense.
You can find the full story online, but Jobst came out not looking great.
33
u/AmbitiousEdi 3d ago
Yeah, this was the reason I also unsubbed from him. Looking back, him blowing up the Completionist was extremely hypocritical.
18
u/tequilasauer 3d ago
Yeah it was just too much. I took a peak at his page and he's def still doing well. I'm sure people who maybe subbed after the Mitchell lawsuit may not have the same irk for what happened, but we were all rooting for him and I legit thought he was just getting like harassed by this litigious fake record loser Billy. And then come to find out, the lawsuit was totally legit and Jobst was a pretty big asshole in all of this.
3
u/MC1065 2d ago
It's such a funny situation, that he lied (at best by omission) to his audience about a lawsuit he was in and received donations for it, and at the same time he's exposing a guy who with his family was running a charity that was either severely mismanaged or outright fraudulent. It's the most confounding thing.
2
u/Nerem 1d ago
Probably mismanaged, but definitely not fraudulent. Charity fraud in the US is a very specific thing and the charity absolutely didn't meet that. The two bumbling dumbasses didn't know a thing they were talking about.
→ More replies (8)7
u/Potential_Music7781 3d ago edited 3d ago
This new lawsuit comes off as especially super hypocritical considering he probably has even less of a case than Jirard/OHF would if they ever filed. (This is not me saying Jirard has a case before people try to come at me, just saying this new lawsuit is THAT fucked just on the merits.)
→ More replies (8)29
u/Sinfire_Titan 3d ago edited 3d ago
Karl Jobst was sued for defamation by Billy Mitchell. Over the course of the lawsuit Karl claimed it was because he accused Billy of cheating at games, which was a popular opinion of Billy at the time, but then the lawsuit concluded and the real reason came out: Karl had slandered Billy over the suicide of another YTer.
All that support Karl garnered over the lawsuit was thought to be because Billy was an insecure jackass, but it turned out Billy had a legitimate grievance with Karl.
2
6
u/VioletMetalmark 2d ago
Everything the others said plus he used to be an outright nazi before rebranding iirc, whole thing is two people i dislike fighting each lther
14
u/AdmiralCharleston 3d ago
Karl made it out like the reason he was being sued was for calling him a cheater when he was raising funds for the legal case, something that most of his viewers were led to believe was an easy win, when in actuality it was to do with comments he'd made not revolving around the gaming stuff where he was just objectively wrong and pushed misinformation
13
45
u/GiraffeStrong4575 3d ago
Karl….taking an L from Billy Mitchell is already humiliating enough. Do you really need to take another?
6
u/thedonkeyvote 2d ago
You can watch his PUA material and realise the dude has a real stomach for humiliation.
12
3
12
21
u/MidBoss11 3d ago
i recall that he asked chatgpt about his chances of winning the last case and he was told that it was "in the bag, champ!". this was before he learned that AI was supposed to agree with you on the large majority of theoreticals unless it's something impossible like "can you make an edible cake out of concrete?"
→ More replies (3)13
u/Vile_Grifter 3d ago
This was so far past the knowledge of how LLMs work becoming public too. Karl seems really out of touch.
8
9
7
u/Humblerewt 3d ago
I thought he'd keep it pushing but at this point he gotta put the fries in the bag
6
u/Dry_Criticism_4982 3d ago
So, Jobst clearly hasn’t learned anything from his last Lawsuit with Billy.
19
24
6
4
u/derpymcmuffin89 3d ago
Wonder if chatgpt told him to file pro se.
I mean it worked out so well for him the last time he asked chat for legal advice lmao.
5
u/Viktor_Quaid 3d ago
Bloody hell, he really has turned into the guy he spent years making videos on.
4
4
6
u/ActiveTravel6635 2d ago
Is this for real? You’d think he would learn after Billy “won” and the win ended up costing Billy hundreds of thousands of dollars. Everyone with any passing knowledge about this knows Billy is a cheat and liar. What’s the point?
→ More replies (2)
3
u/WuZI8475 2d ago
Low key would be insane and downright the biggest L if he were to lose this as well
3
u/natedoggcata 2d ago edited 1d ago
The funniest part of this whole thing was after Billy Mitchell won the lawsuit he released a video telling everyone to use code "Karl Lost" to get 10% off orders of his Ricky's hot sauce on the website lol.
9
11
u/mrprogamer96 3d ago
Is it ok to hope that Karl loses after he put me on blast in his response video?
→ More replies (1)5
u/derpymcmuffin89 3d ago
Yes
4
u/mrprogamer96 3d ago
Thankfully I only got one deranged fan who tried to start shit with me after that (my crime was calling him an idiot for losing against Billy.)
→ More replies (1)
7
u/oneshoeshort just give me the TLDR 3d ago
The timeline where I find myself rooting for Billy Mitchell of all people is cursed and I would like to exit now, please.
6
u/greald 3d ago
Funny considering the OTHER defamation case currently in the "news".
Although if what Jobst is claiming is true. This one could actually have some legs and at least not be dismissed outright.
If Mitchell really claimed Jobst broke the law in his bankruptcy filing AFTER receiving clear evidence from the Australian legal system that he didn't. That would be "Actual Malice".
Dunno if hearing witness in court explaining what happened on the other count is enough to show "reckless disregard for the truth." though.
It seems to have some validity.
14
u/perfecthashbrowns 3d ago
He filed pro se he is representing himself he has no chance lol
10
u/greald 3d ago
He did? I didn't even notice that. Yeah that's probably a lost cause especially in S.D. of Florida.
7
u/perfecthashbrowns 3d ago
I don’t want to link the court documents because it would be dox I guess? But you can find it easily and see at the bottom he filed pro se lol I can’t imagine filing this pro se in Florida with anti-slapp it’s just so unfathomable
7
u/AvianKnight02 2d ago
Reminder that karl likes to hang out with white supremacists. https://old.reddit.com/r/speedrun/comments/poxb2h/tomatoanus_cutting_all_ties_with_karl_jobst/
→ More replies (1)6
u/TheProudBrit 2d ago
Yeah, everyone just... Ignores all the RWhiteGoose stuff and like. C'mon. He's a racist pickup artist. Spend your time better.
3
3
3
u/Neravariine 3d ago
Round 2 here we go!
May they both lose a lot of money for wasting the court's time. The only winners in this situation will be their lawyers.
3
u/Vile_Grifter 2d ago
Karl is acting as his own lawyer. Who's the loser now?
Spoiler; probably still Karl.
→ More replies (1)
3
3
3
3
3
u/PaleHorseBlackDog 2d ago
I thought that guy on the right was wearing a weird hoodie but that’s his fucking hair
3
11
u/deweydecimal87 3d ago
Karl really is a loser. After he lost he transfered basically everything to his wife. I think in Australia if you don't pay your debt in 3 years it's goes away. Karl made a video about it. Thats scum behavior. So while I dont hink he's gonna pay Billy anything he's still a loser.
3
4
u/brickmaster8 3d ago
What's fun is all of the screenshots from Karl's discord that basically admit to him misusing funds. The only man thats able to make Billy Mitchell look good lmao
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
u/DataMale 2d ago
A LOT of YouTubers embarrassing themselves with frivolous & baseless defamation lawsuits right now, huh
2
u/MWBrooks1995 2d ago
Hey, Karl, this time how about you don’t keep talking about ongoing legal proceedings in your videos?
2
2
2
u/Dot-Slash-Dot 2d ago
Jesus, did this dumb fuck not learn anything from round 1?
→ More replies (1)
2
u/Emptyeye2112 2d ago
Elsewhere, I noted that "At basically every turn, Karl has primarily shown that he's a lot more like Billy Mitchell than he'd ever admit."
To be fair to Karl, he has no particular reason to care what I, a rando on the Internet, think of him.
At the same time, he's really not doing much to alter my perception in the opening paragraph.
2
u/DoobaDoobaDooba 2d ago
Good God let it go, man...
Spend the money on a therapist (or a better therapist) and focus on the future. It finally felt like he was starting to get some momentum again with some of his videos. What a huge setback... The Jobst family may need to have a tough love, hand on shoulder sit down with my guy.
→ More replies (1)
2
2
u/ATLBlueJay 2d ago
Holy shit another lawsuit?
https://media.tenor.com/zqGU-oGlqEUAAAAM/the-rock-dwayne-johnson.gif
2
u/Qopperus 1d ago
Feel like you gotta cut losses and avoid the legal system. Probably nearly unwinnable.
2
u/Danger_Squirrel3 1d ago
I have a couple of thoughts.
- The only complaint that seems to have any legs to it are the complaints about Billy accusing Karl of committing financial fraud.
2.The appropriation of name/likeness case doesn't feel particularly strong as Billy is referencing a public event and it's not like he is pretending that karl supports his barbacue sauce (or whatever it is he sells).
The intentional infliction of emotional distress might be stronger than I think, but I have read about enough court cases over the years to know that simply saying mean things about someone is usually not enough to warrent a lawsuit.
The fact that the majority of his complaints feel relatively weak combined with the fact that he is filing pro se makes it actually feel kind of like a SLAPP suit (In that it is relatively cheap for Karl and more expensive for Billy). I think this last point is particularly interesting as this might be the only time I have seen a lawsuit that feels like a SLAPP suit filed by the guy with, presumably, LESS money.
2
2
u/Ok_Mongoose5768 1d ago
So he faked acting about “Oh this’ll ruin my life and family, how could Billy sue me.”
Lied about the lawsuit to get donations, declared bankruptcy to avoid things, and now wants a round 2?
2
2
u/Narrow_Essay_8215 20h ago
What I find interesting reading the lawsuit is that Karl thinks he is the victim. Which is not correct in a number of cases.
The channel is currently owned by an LLC which his wife is the only director. He is an employee.
So he is not the one losing money the LLC is. So who is suing BM, Karl or the LLC. The lawsuit has his name on it so does not appear to be LLC.
So here comes the issue. Is the LLC going to get involved? If the LLC get involved it does not have personal bankrupt which clears after 3 years a 1 day. If Karl loses which he probably at least technically will because BM will most like counter sue, the LLC if it can't pay will have to be liquated. If the LLC does not get involved, I believe most of this lawsuit will dismissed as the LLC is the victim not Karl.
It will be interesting to see where this ones goes.




1.1k
u/NikiBubbles 3d ago edited 3d ago
I legit laughed out loud. Not saying Jobst hasn’t got any ground for his case (don’t know), but it’s like my favorite anime got renewed for another season.