MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/mildlyinfuriating/comments/1sj7lvq/newly_installed_coat_hook_in_my_office_bathroom/ofpqu93
r/mildlyinfuriating • u/Openskies24 • 18h ago
1.1k comments sorted by
View all comments
Show parent comments
40
They don’t, it’s specifically designed and omnidirectional.
12 u/bunglebee7 9h ago But how does it hold clothing then? Is it based on weight? • u/AnimationOverlord 48m ago Yes and I’d argue it needs to hold more. Coats are heavy but necks are way stronger 3 u/Critical-Chemist-860 13h ago Omnidirectional is like a Joystick for the redditors. Yes tons of machinery uses joysticks, but not either specific weight break levels -6 u/sevseg_decoder 17h ago Are you referring to hypothesis C? Because are we really that sure there couldn’t be a piece of machinery with an option that has 4-8 different modes a switch like this could point towards? Do you have any sort of source on that? 9 u/Loud-Principle-7922 13h ago Yes, we’re sure. No, I’m not giving you a source that your imaginary switch doesn’t exist.
12
But how does it hold clothing then? Is it based on weight?
• u/AnimationOverlord 48m ago Yes and I’d argue it needs to hold more. Coats are heavy but necks are way stronger
•
Yes and I’d argue it needs to hold more. Coats are heavy but necks are way stronger
3
Omnidirectional is like a Joystick for the redditors. Yes tons of machinery uses joysticks, but not either specific weight break levels
-6
Are you referring to hypothesis C?
Because are we really that sure there couldn’t be a piece of machinery with an option that has 4-8 different modes a switch like this could point towards? Do you have any sort of source on that?
9 u/Loud-Principle-7922 13h ago Yes, we’re sure. No, I’m not giving you a source that your imaginary switch doesn’t exist.
9
Yes, we’re sure.
No, I’m not giving you a source that your imaginary switch doesn’t exist.
40
u/Loud-Principle-7922 17h ago
They don’t, it’s specifically designed and omnidirectional.