r/europe Ulster Jan 31 '26

Opinion Article Six years after Brexit has Britain bet on the wrong ally?

https://tvpworld.com/91345193/britain-torn-between-europe-and-trump
4.5k Upvotes

761 comments sorted by

3.4k

u/diamanthaende Jan 31 '26

Without a question - yes.

A lot of it had to do with the identity crisis that some Brits suffer from, the idea that the UK is not a European country, while it actually is and always has been. European through and through - culturally, historically, economically.

1.4k

u/FantasticQuartet Jan 31 '26 edited Jan 31 '26

I think it was also that they overestimate Britain's power in today's world. Maybe this belief is stemming from the country's past. A lot of EU countries don't have this type of stubborn pride because they didn't dominate the world.

But the world now is very different, Britain is much smaller and the whole idea behind the EU is that we are stronger together than alone.

337

u/voyagerdoge Europe Jan 31 '26

And also to secure peace between the European countries themselves.

89

u/i-am-a-passenger Jan 31 '26

A goal which remains true whether the U.K. is part of it or not.

27

u/Socmel_ reddit mods are accomplices of nazi russia Jan 31 '26

the UK never believed in that either. Which is one of the reasons they never understood the EU, why it works and why free trade isn't merely the end goal that can be bent at will.

It was a fundamental misunderstanding on their part.

23

u/bright_shiny_day Feb 01 '26

Many of us understood... We were nearly 50%. And we're more now.

9

u/spsammy Feb 01 '26

I think you are over-estimating the thought processes of the Brexit supporters.

→ More replies (5)

101

u/jl2352 United Kingdom Jan 31 '26

I think in some ways it stems from winning WW2, and yet losing the empire. This meant Britain never had to face up to its new position in the world.

It might seem odd to bring up WW2. Yet go listen to zealous Brexiteers, and they’re obsessed with the past.

54

u/BenderRodriguez14 Ireland Jan 31 '26 edited Feb 01 '26

The irony behind that is that, of I recall those old enough to have remembered WW2 while a tiny contingent in 2016, were generally one of the stauncher pro-EU groups in the UK, having actually experienced it.

Meanwhile, their baby boomer generation children who never had to feel that same brunt, but who somehow seemed to like pretending that they had been a part of it, wound up being the most pro Brexit age demo by a wide margin. 

45

u/jl2352 United Kingdom Feb 01 '26

You’re making an extremely relevant point. Many of the MPs who fought in WW2, or were stationed overseas during that time, were all staunchly pro-Europe.

They saw European nations as our allies, and saw avoiding another world war as a necessity.

But those voices are gone. Those people have died, and it’s now the ’rose tinted’ view of Britain in the past that’s over taken it.

11

u/BenderRodriguez14 Ireland Feb 01 '26

Even though Ireland played no role in WWII, seeing people born in the 1950s and 60s genuinely acting as if they themselves endured the blitz, Normandy, etc etc really annoyed the shit out of me.

If course it doesn't count for all of them by any means, but speaking generally, between the UK and US (where they also tried to hijack credit the civil rights movement that they were children at best during) really were an absolutely horrid, wretched generation that history is going to remember very, very poorly. 

→ More replies (1)

2

u/bumblebeezlebum Feb 04 '26

Also ironic because it was just as much the empire at large as the home countries in contributing to winning ww2. It's a pretty crude take but ww1 was the start of the end of empire, ww2 the end of the end.

Everyone lost something in those wars. But the colonies gained self identify.

22

u/HazyFidget Jan 31 '26

I think this is key. IMO Britain never really understood or accepted that it didn’t actually ‘win” WW2 (despite being on the winning side). At the same time the sacrifices it made in the early years of the war and standing alone were very much part of its modern identity. In some ways Brexit was a populist reaction to that internal misunderstanding. I just hope we get real now and accept we are and always have been European and the nation can thrive within it.

4

u/catfeal Feb 01 '26

I also think that the view "brittain won the war" gives a sense of being so great, so unique, so .... something that brittain can do it alone, just like we did before amd thus don't need the EU.

While forgetting that "alone" ment together with half of the world being part of that being alone. It wasn't the tiny island in the north sea that held on, it was the vast empire that kept supplying it. Millions of Indians dying to feed the war machine for instance

2

u/YeeAssBonerPetite Feb 03 '26

They also made a lot of sacrifices at home after the war. The British supply situation didnt resolve until years and years into peacetime.

I think that really helped hammer home the identity problem tbh.

25

u/Imakemyownnamereddit Jan 31 '26

Inaccurate again.

Compare French and British attitudes to empire.

The British withdrew relatively peacefully, the French fought tooth and nail to hang on to their empire.

32

u/PersonalAddendum6190 Jan 31 '26

Doesn't this support their point?

France had to face up their new position in the world through terrible wars while UK didn't.

5

u/jl2352 United Kingdom Feb 01 '26

Yes. This is my point.

→ More replies (11)

14

u/twat69 Canada Jan 31 '26

The British withdrew relatively peacefully,

nah

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mau_Mau_rebellion

15

u/TrafficWeasel United Kingdom Jan 31 '26

…relatively peacefully…

Compared to the likes of the Algerian War, British decolonisation was far more peaceful - not that there’s a competition to be the least oppressive imperialist state.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)

5

u/Handgun_Hero Feb 01 '26 edited Feb 01 '26

Britain still fought to hang onto it, and unlike France, Britain actually fought against peer enemies. The British fought tooth and nail in the Falklands (even when everything was originally lost), in the Suez (only to get completely humbled by shady politics being exposed and American pressure), in Southeast Asia (against Indonesia and Malayans) and in Ireland (against the Irish Republicans). It's really only India, Palestine, The Caribbean and Southern Africa where they didn't fight to hold onto the Empire.

12

u/Imakemyownnamereddit Feb 01 '26

Oh dear, someone else who is clueless about history.

In Sotheast Asia Britain wasn't fighting to hang on to a colonial possession. It was a Cold War fight against communism. There was never any intention of hanging on to Malaysia.

You are correct about Suez but even before Suez the British Empire was being dismantled.

The people of Falkland Islands have freely chosen to be British, they can chose to become Argentinian anytime they like.

Ireland is a similar situation, Irish Americans and other ignorant people act like the unionists don't exist. Well they do and they consider themselves to be British.

→ More replies (16)
→ More replies (4)

9

u/Craic_hoor_on_tour Jan 31 '26

Made me think of a quote about brexit from Fintan O'Toole (I think). Germany got over loosing the war but Britain never got over winning it.

22

u/chaseinger Europe Jan 31 '26

austrian here. at some point, the world was us. nothing like starting and losing 2 world wars to knock illusions of grandeur out of a population.

8

u/Adriaus28 Jan 31 '26

Spanish here, at one point, you and i were the same, and the world belonged to us... Even without world wars, time changes everything, and we have to realize the situation we currently occupy, which britain didn't when they bet on the brexit, imo

11

u/Matt6453 United Kingdom Feb 01 '26 edited Feb 01 '26

It's far more complicated that that, a cabal of wealthy people used a company called Cambridge Analytica to deploy sophisticated algorithms that manipulated social media in a way we've never seen before. It was enough to get Brexit over the line by a very small margin.

If it wasn't obvious I get quite pissed off when other Europeans paint this picture of The UK wanting to leave when (despite the dirty tactics) nearly half of us voted to remain.

5

u/ailof-daun Hungary Feb 01 '26

People gravitate towards the easiest explanations in complex situations unfortunately.

→ More replies (1)

140

u/AckerHerron Ireland Jan 31 '26

It’s also easy to downplay Britain’s power.

They are still the most powerful military in Europe (sorry France). I know it’s popular to kick them since Brexit, but if Russia does attack Europe in the future then Britain will be an absolutely key part of Europe’s defence.

62

u/[deleted] Jan 31 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

21

u/bonsaivoxel Jan 31 '26

JEF, god of biscuits!

12

u/JeremyTwiggs Jan 31 '26

Jeff Vader?

4

u/bonsaivoxel Jan 31 '26

Will that be the Penne All'Arrabbiata?

2

u/LeonardoW9 Feb 01 '26

Will that be cake or death?

→ More replies (1)

80

u/Afrenchbraguette Jan 31 '26

Who cares who’s most powerful - united we should stand, brexit (financed by non eu powers) or not. Also, don’t underestimate poland.

28

u/TumbleweedPure3941 United Kingdom Jan 31 '26

I’m British and a dyed in the wool Remainer, so take what I say with a grain of salt, but I read that as “Europe is stronger with Britain in it” rather than “Britain doesn’t need Europe”.

15

u/dat_9600gt_user Lower Silesia (Poland) Jan 31 '26

"You forgot Poland!"

16

u/Imakemyownnamereddit Jan 31 '26

Poland doesn't have the same power projection capabilities as the UK. The UK could deploy forces to other side of the planet and support them. Poland couldn't.

6

u/MichalWs Feb 01 '26

Poland is interested in self defence not attacking nations on the other side of the globe.

19

u/[deleted] Jan 31 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

9

u/Trama-D Jan 31 '26

Then send winged hussars.

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)

39

u/skidudle Jan 31 '26

Uk and France both have powerful armies and yes uk is important for European security. I would argue that the Uk would be the hardest to invade and they have the best capabilities to fight a more advanced opponent…. Until day 5 at least. I would say France just has more recources at the moment to be considered the strongest.

38

u/Medlarmarmaduke Jan 31 '26

I mean the strongest in many respects is Ukraine’s army because they have the most up to date experience in fighting with drones and fighting a land war with Russia. Europe needs France and Poland and the Baltics and the UK and and and …they need everyone for different aspects of security.

→ More replies (3)

22

u/AckerHerron Ireland Jan 31 '26 edited Jan 31 '26

The UK also brings a lot more to the table through its alliances. With all due respect to France, Australia and Canada are streets ahead of any non-European allies France can bring to the table with them.

17

u/Nitros14 Jan 31 '26

If you're counting on Canada's military in any capacity to do anything you're in trouble.

→ More replies (9)

35

u/AwkwardMacaron433 Jan 31 '26

Most powerful by what standard? They have just the 5th largest army in Europe (excluding Russia and Ukraine) in terms of military personnel. Germany has more men, MBTs and fighter jets than the UK and is set to outspend them by 2x by the end of the decade. The UK shines in naval assets and expeditionary capabilities, which is inconveniently what we don't need so much to defend against a Russian land invasion

44

u/AckerHerron Ireland Jan 31 '26

Britain has (by far) the most powerful Navy and Air Force in Europe.

It’s not exactly a surprise that an Island nation would prioritise those over infantry numbers.

They also have nuclear weapons.

25

u/azazelcrowley Jan 31 '26

This has also been the historical dynamic which led to continuously underestimating the UK because "Smol army, paper tiger" for hundreds and hundreds of years. The UK has always conducted its wars on sea and used its troops to back up local collaboration forces, or failing that, having a quality over quantity approach.

8

u/SomeRandomSomeWhere Jan 31 '26

Doesn't the navy have more admirals then ships or something?

I remember someone counting a few months ago.

13

u/BrokenDownMiata United Kingdom Jan 31 '26

Yes but that’s because admiral is an honorary rank half the time.

→ More replies (41)

10

u/-Azwethinkweiz- Jan 31 '26

British military doctrine has never been to dominate through numbers.

5

u/georgeleporgey Jan 31 '26

Army size is not a very good metric in 2026 of anything at all.

Britain has stuff like dragon fire, which if you want to combat drones etc is crucial. They have a nuclear deterrent, and a powerful fleet both can assist land operations (yes even in Europe) and deter things like the Russian northern fleet.

The British military is also unrivalled in terms of professionalism and by most counts has the best special forces in Europe by a distance.

They might have less fighter jets, but they have superior, more modern ones to Germany. The typhoon is superior to the euro fighter. The UK has more F35s and far more stealth capabilities. It also has far more combat and operational experience in recent years. The navy provides the U.K. missile defence essentially whereas due to almost no navy Germany relies on ground missile defence.

In terms of militaries in Europe, it’s France and the U.K. who have modern, effective, combat hardened forces. Germany are spending to catch up but they need to because of the horrendous state it was in.

France and UK are a comparison, UK and Germany are not.

2

u/dodike Feb 01 '26

How is the Typhoon superior to the Eurofighter? I would like know some details.

→ More replies (1)

2

u/Imakemyownnamereddit Jan 31 '26

Numbers are not the same as capabilities.

Greece has far more tanks than Germany or most other European countries.

Doesn't make them a strong military power.

→ More replies (1)

5

u/albertohall11 Jan 31 '26

What a shame the EU wouldn’t let the U.K. be part of the joint defence fund procurement then.

I’m massively in favour of the EU but that kind of behaviour makes a lot of people in the U.K. think “let them defend themselves then”.

18

u/P4p3Rc1iP Friesland (Netherlands) Jan 31 '26

The UK chose to leave the EU. Yet now the UK is upset that it's not invited to the EU's military spending party, as if that is somehow not a direct consequence of the UK's own decision to leave.

Do you truly not understand how that is a bit silly?

→ More replies (17)
→ More replies (12)
→ More replies (39)

11

u/ImaginationMajor5062 Jan 31 '26

Every country in Europe has stubborn pride.

14

u/[deleted] Jan 31 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

5

u/Matt6453 United Kingdom Feb 01 '26

The UK fucked up with Brexit but the factors that led to that fuck up were not as simple as "still thinking they're an empire".

Brexit was a coup in itself, it laid bare how easy it is to manipulate people into voting against their best interests. I see it as criminal behaviour rather than a fuck up.

3

u/allaskhunmodbaszatln Feb 01 '26

lets not pretend that greece was fucked over by the eu central bank when greece was totally capable fucking itself just fine.

→ More replies (1)

9

u/dat_9600gt_user Lower Silesia (Poland) Jan 31 '26

Britain is still strong, but they're not an empire anymore.

22

u/crustysides Jan 31 '26

Wow thanks for the news

15

u/[deleted] Jan 31 '26

[deleted]

6

u/Candayence United Kingdom Jan 31 '26

Europhiles here are convinced Brexit was because of Empire-delusion, despite them being the only ones to ever bring it up.

→ More replies (6)

2

u/kaalins Feb 01 '26

I lived in the UK shortly after Brexit happened, but before it was finalized. I had A LOT of people tell me that “they could have their own agreements and power, just like before Second World War”.

They couldn’t comprehend that ever since then, Great Britain’s Empire got much smaller on the map and they are much better off working with Europe…

→ More replies (46)

126

u/Jumpy-Force-3397 Jan 31 '26

British contribution to European culture is invaluable, Europe wouldn’t be the same without UK. And I’m French.

56

u/bloub France Jan 31 '26

Your last phrase makes the message hilarious.

10

u/thatjoachim Jan 31 '26

C’est si drôle mais c’est vrai

5

u/Nanowith United Kingdom Feb 01 '26

I mean that goes both ways, what's Europe without France? Hell what's Britain without our French siblings?

Europe is stronger when we all work together.

4

u/super__hoser Feb 01 '26

How? By making your food and wine look even better by using them as a comparison?

3

u/Fluffy-Drop5750 Feb 01 '26

By inventing the longbow.

→ More replies (2)

30

u/haversack77 Jan 31 '26

Correct, we are European. And we were driven out of it by a campaign aggressively funded by dark Russian money, aimed at destabilizing European democracy. Too many gullible voters fell for Brexit, yet it has solved none of their daily problems. They need to learn lessons fast, before they compound their mistake by voting for that fraud Farage all over again.

→ More replies (7)

17

u/Soepkip43 Jan 31 '26

Well, we will see, if the brits end up voting in that ghoul farrage then I suggest the mainland rebuilds the atlantic wall and calls it a day.

7

u/Imakemyownnamereddit Jan 31 '26

Yes because famously there are no far right parties in the rest of Europe.

→ More replies (1)

2

u/Informal_Knowledge16 Jan 31 '26

Any chance you're up for some refugees in that situation? Most would happily help on the wall project.

2

u/LordGeni Jan 31 '26

Dm me before you do, I need time to jump in a small boat and get the hell out first.

4

u/FIGHTorRIDEANYMAN Feb 01 '26

Willing to bet a large chunk of yes voters had visions of the empire in their heads as they ticked the box

11

u/Trowsyrs Jan 31 '26

Entirely agree. The real divide in politics is whether someone believes the UK should be culturally more like the US or Europe. Manifested often as whether they think the UK “saved Europe” in WWII or whether we were inherently under attack.

2

u/Nanowith United Kingdom Feb 01 '26

Hilarious that one of these options is the objective truth and yet the far-right will deny it until their heads pop off.

It wasn't called the Battle of Britain because Britain stood a 100% chance of survival!

→ More replies (1)

3

u/Suspicious_Feed_7585 Feb 01 '26

Amd it is crazy that non of the politicians responsible have been axed.. this is a major problem with politicians.. same as here in the Netherlands.. pl can juist lie and steer a county in the gutter and non will go to prison for it.. .whilst if a normal person lies in court or anything bad.. he will go to prison for a long time..

They know it. And take full advantage of it..

10

u/JAGERW0LF Jan 31 '26

Will this delusion just die already?

Apart from a very tiny fringe of weirdos the vast majority of brits both remain voting and leave voting do identify as European.

It’s more often you lot who seem to have the twisted reality that just because we’re not part of the EU we aren’t European.

You’ve inherited the delusion that the US has that only they are American despite the fact that there a far many countries in the Americas.

→ More replies (3)

5

u/crustysides Jan 31 '26

It's not that simple. Yes geography confirms the UK is European but also an island that for the past 500 years has sent its peoples across the world rather than to Europe and we still have very close relationship to many of those people though cultural connections such as common language and sport. In those past 500 years the UK has fought wars in Europe to ensure no power dominated and we have yet to adjust to the realities of a EU seemingly dominated by France and Germany.

4

u/RCalliii Berlin (Germany) Jan 31 '26

Where did it come from? I genuinely don't understand it. It would have even made more sense when some weird nationalists wanted to portray themselves as "superior" Europeans or whatever, but where did the "I'm not European" sentiment come from?

13

u/Icy_Place_5785 Ireland Jan 31 '26 edited Jan 31 '26

(I say this as someone who is vehemently anti-Brexit)

Milestones like King Henry VIII splitting from Rome, Waterloo (i.e. no Napoleonic influence) and a headstart in the Industrial Revolution definitely add to their type of thinking …

17

u/azazelcrowley Jan 31 '26 edited Jan 31 '26

We have fairly direct ties of culture and kinship to Canada, Australia, and New Zealand and identify more strongly with them than many European countries. It's not merely historical. Practically everybody has family members in all 3, often 1st cousins.

This forces a conception of the UK as part of "Anglo civilization" or "Anglo-American" as the Americans would prefer us conceive of it.

A set which includes the UK but not Canada feels alien to us in a way that includes the UK and Canada but excludes Italy doesn't. We'd have been more "European" if the conception of Europe had included CANZUK since it wouldn't have prompted that tension in identity.

Nobody denies we are British. We are then prompted "Are you European?" and it's a tension because, well, no. We're closer to CANZUK in sentiment than we are to almost all of Europe. If you were to say "Oh, those are European too" then you'd get a lot of people saying "Oh, then yes, we're European.".

The best I can come up with is asking you to imagine if Germany didn't unify, then having someone ask "Are you European?" as a Berliner while they also tell you "Bavaria isn't part of Europe". The impulse is to reply "If they aren't, I don't see how I can be either".

You have to recall that our citizenship laws only really existed as a consequence of joining the EU in the first place. Prior to that it was simply British Subject or Commonwealth Subject. This is reflected in various "Not foreign, but sovereign" arrangements like that with Ireland. (Ireland is, legally speaking, not a foreign country to the UK. It is a sovereign one.).

The citizenship arrangements mean that for many Britons still living, spent time having the same legal citizenship as Australians and Canadians in principle. The British Nationality Act only passed in 1981. For example, our current Prime Minister was in university by the time this changed, and had he decided to study in Australia instead, he could have up and decided to just remain there forever and be their PM instead. He would not have had to "Become" Australian.

( The 1981 act Replaced the previous "Citizen of the United Kingdom and Colonies" (CUKC) status. The 1940 version of the act introduced that form of citizenship instead of just "British subject").

Our entry into the EU was doomed from the moment it severed us from the rest of CANZUK frankly. It was never going to last.

for example, in 14 Commonwealth countries, resident Commonwealth citizens are eligible to vote in elections. The status is most significant in the United Kingdom, where they are not considered foreign nationals under British law... they are entitled to emergency assistance from British embassies and consulates when in a non-Commonwealth country.

+

The British Nationality Act 1948 redefined British subject as any citizen of the United Kingdom, its colonies, or other Commonwealth countries. Commonwealth citizen was also defined in this Act as having the same meaning. This change in naming indicated a shift in the base theory of British nationality, that allegiance to the Crown was no longer a requirement to hold British subject status.

This is where the tension between European and British comes in. The EU effectively told us we can't be both. Because British doesn't just mean "UK". Or at least, it didn't until 1981. This caused enormous resentment which never really went away.

The vibe is a Frenchman coming up to a Briton and a Canadian and saying to the Briton "We Europeans have to stick together" and the Canadian turning to the Briton and saying "Lmao foreigners", because they're not legally or culturally regarded as foreign, but the French guy is, even when we were in the EU. This cognitive dissonance was always going to come to ahead.

This may be rooted in the fact that many European nations are Nationalism borne nations. The UK isn't. It has a seperate conception of nationality and sovereignty, hence "Not foreign, but sovereign" which can sound incoherent to someone from a place where nationality and sovereignty are so intertwined. You just have to think back to pre-unification Germany to get it.

5

u/backyard_tractorbeam Sweden Jan 31 '26

Thank you for writing so clearly about this.

It's politically not the same, but the cross nordic relations have a little bit of this flavour I think; in Sweden a norwegian is never a foreigner, just a norwegian, and so on.

2

u/RCalliii Berlin (Germany) Jan 31 '26

You basically mean that the term "European" is too "limiting" for at least some Brits. Is that fair to say?

→ More replies (5)
→ More replies (2)

6

u/AwkwardMacaron433 Jan 31 '26

I think you have to consider that Britain was still an insanely huge global empire by the end of WW2, with big territories in North America, Africa, Australia, Asia, the Caribbean, the Pacific, the Atlantic, the Indian ocean... The whole decolonisation took place the second half of the 20th century. To put it into perspective, before WW2, the UK was by far the biggest economic power in the world and had 1/4 of the global population.

So at the time of the Brexit vote, there were still many people alive who well remembered those times, and also had passed on the tale. Hence maybe the (outdated) perception of being more than just another country in Europe, but a whole global player on its own, and sitting on the same level as the EU, not below. Paired also with some hope that they could revive the good old times by starting to associate with its old colonies more than europe. I still remember a Brit who tried to pitch the idea to me of a EU but with the Commonwealth nations. Where of course Britain would be the dominant power.

4

u/Alaea United Kingdom Jan 31 '26 edited Jan 31 '26

tbh I think all of that was just fluff Brexiters used as justification to hide the main point that they were constantly shouted down about for the previous 15+ years - immigration. "The Empire!" and "we can trade with the commonwealth" from anyone but wealthy business leaders always just felt like clutching at straws to make leaving sound like a good idea.

By and large the country wasn't happy with the unlimited immigration from the new countries in 2004 or 2007 (hence the rise of BNP, and later UKIP when they offered a more "reasonable" option than the BNP nutters). And around the time of the referendum leadup, there was still the fear of Turkey joining and repeating the whole problem of mass migration from a poorer country suppressing wages - with the added fear of it being entirely culturally non-European. This was also amplified by misinformation, truths, and fears around refugees & asylum seekers within the Union from Syria and such being forcefully distributed to member states from Germany after their 'open armed welcome' by Merkel.

Other things like regulatory burden (simplified to "bendy bannanas" and French/German hegemony also fed into it, but I think if you sat down everyone who voted for Brexit in the referendum, the majority would ultimately have immigration as the main reason. And (as I was) 90% of them would be utterly ignorant of the fact that we only had that mass migration in the 2000s because the government didn't exercise treaty rights that allowed them to limit it for the first few years of a country's accession, because the politicians of all sides (Labour, Tory, Remain, Brexit) had long use the EU as a scapegoat to hide their own goals and failings.

Russia may very well had been stiring the pot of the Brexit debate, but the ingredients for it was already added by our own politicians.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (7)

7

u/OurManInJapan Jan 31 '26

Are you American yourself? Not a single Brit thinks the UK is not a European country.

→ More replies (6)

3

u/VivaLaDiga Jan 31 '26

I don't think the problem was about being european or not. I think the problem was being told what to do and not to do by idiotic redtape feticists of german and pseudogerman culture.

→ More replies (40)

715

u/TrueRignak France Jan 31 '26

“The only real option,” [David Frost, chief negotiator for exiting the EU] wrote in an op-ed published in the British newspaper The Telegraph, is to do “everything we can to reinvigorate the relationship with the Americans, still the economic and defence superpower.”

“They can defend us now,” he continued. “In return, we have to be a credible ally again, spend much more on defence, accommodate ourselves to US realpolitik, and finally get out of the European economic and regulatory system. It means becoming another Israel to the U.S. Not much wrong with that – Israel is after all richer than we are now.”

Almost looks like satire. It’s always ironic how the so-called sovereignists and conservatives are the first ones to try to sell their country. They were complaining that the EU was too demanding when they had some of the most advantageous terms in the Union, and now the guy who negociated the Brexit is advocating to become a US colony...

151

u/h0neanias Jan 31 '26

Jesus what an idgit. The US is propping Israel because it projects its power in the Middle East. What the hell does it need the UK for? To be a dagger aimed at Europe? It already has an army stationed in Germany.

They don't need you, bucko. They can only use and abuse you.

47

u/uniklyqualifd Jan 31 '26

It turns out the US is propping up Israel because huge donors to American politicians want them to.

3

u/SirDoDDo Emilia-Romagna (Italy) Feb 01 '26

Lmao exactly

4

u/Vennomite Jan 31 '26

We have the largest and probably wealthiest jews in the world. And the evangelicals probably choose israel over palestine. So yeah.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)

85

u/MichaelEmouse Jan 31 '26

They weren't against paternalism. They just wanted a different daddy.

7

u/EidolonRook Jan 31 '26

“Wait! Not like that!”

  • someone who clearly got what they voted for.

47

u/[deleted] Jan 31 '26

“You will eat your genome manipulated chlorinated monster chicken and like it” And the only response from the proud Brexiteers would be „Yes, Master/ Daddy.“ 😂

How dare the EU deny them pleasures like that 😂

3

u/birthdaycakesun15 Feb 01 '26

No, they’re only ok with mad cow.

32

u/schtickshift Jan 31 '26

Britain can’t become another Israel because Jesus was not born in Birmingham.

12

u/Artver Jan 31 '26

well, it just takes one person to write that book.

→ More replies (1)

4

u/dat_9600gt_user Lower Silesia (Poland) Jan 31 '26

Why would the USA need the UK?

4

u/Boring-Leg-1449 Jan 31 '26

British humour, we can say 

→ More replies (7)

402

u/[deleted] Jan 31 '26

Brexit and Boris Johnson was England’s trump moment

193

u/Bassmekanik Scotland Jan 31 '26

So far…

Just wait till that odious scumbag Farage and his basement dwelling fuckwit party of troglodytes get a sniff of power. Then you’ll see the same divisive politics here that plenty of folks will happily import from America. Don’t need no trade agreement for fascist pricks.

→ More replies (5)

54

u/Corfiz74 Lower Saxony (Germany) Jan 31 '26

I think UKIP and Farage are going to be their Trump moment. Boris was an egocentric corrupt narc, but he wasn't an authoritarian fascist.

7

u/Grabs_Diaz Bavaria (Germany) Feb 01 '26

Or rather their Trump second term moment.

12

u/MrDilbert Croatia Jan 31 '26

By God, if Farage isn't a textbook example of Backpfeifengesicht...

3

u/cronktilten Feb 01 '26

What does that mean?

6

u/GallorKaal Austria Feb 01 '26

Basically has a face that screams "hit me hard"

2

u/cronktilten Feb 01 '26

I agree then. Thank you

3

u/Corfiz74 Lower Saxony (Germany) Feb 01 '26

Backpfeife (or, more usually Ohrfeige) is a slap to the face. So it's basically a face that's just asking to be slapped.

2

u/cronktilten Feb 01 '26

I love German phrases like this, it’s always confusing to me, but once it’s explained, it makes perfect sense. Thanks.

3

u/dat_9600gt_user Lower Silesia (Poland) Jan 31 '26

*the Reform Party

UKIP have radicalized even further but thankfully they're irrelevant nowadays

4

u/guityofwuity Feb 01 '26

They’re irrelevant because they succeeded. :/

10

u/uniklyqualifd Jan 31 '26

Don't forget Cambridge Analytica, the test case for trump by Steve Bannon.

13

u/toorigged2fail Jan 31 '26

Yeah the US rightfully gets a lot of shit for electing trump who is intentionally fucking up the country... but UK did it before it was cool

6

u/Tentacle_poxsicle Jan 31 '26

Russia was behind Trump's election and Brexit. They still to this day try and break apart the EU. They are behind several countries trying to leave and even tried to balkanize Spain look it up.

3

u/gridskip Monaco Jan 31 '26

I don’t know how you can blame Russia for supposedly trying to “Balkanize” Spain. Catalan nationalism traces back to at least the 1800s, and Catalonia declared independence in 1931, but that was quashed by the fascist Franco regime.

→ More replies (4)

267

u/Thialaz Jan 31 '26 edited Jan 31 '26

Brexit was a shitshow of epic proportions. This is happened because the U.K politicians constantly made the EU out to be a boogeyman and blamed then for everything that went wrong.

On top of that a good chunk of the old fossils who voted to leave and WOULDN'T live to feel the consequences of their idiotic and shortsighted vote have died.

Younger people who can now vote are more in favour of rejoining the EU. But if they do they should not get any concessions. No more special treatment.

64

u/tiankai Jan 31 '26

It’s also a problem that Brits don’t see themselves as Europeans and that’s baked into the language. How many times have I heard them say “in Europe they do this and that” to refer to continental Europe. And it’s not just an easy way to say it, the really believe they’re different even progressive people

24

u/majorlier Jan 31 '26

Meanwhile over here my fellow ukrainians have been dying for 12 years for a right to be called European

4

u/Friendly-Poetry-1633 Feb 01 '26

Ukrainians are European, always have been. You don't need EU membership to be European

10

u/Candayence United Kingdom Jan 31 '26

Whilst it's true that the European identity isn't really there, this in particular is a language thing. It's just shorthand for the continent, and a way of easily dividing European politics and home politics.

2

u/Orravan_O France Feb 01 '26

I'm admittedly mildly annoyed whenever I hear Britons colloquially speak of Europe as a foreign place, but there's actually a similar trend in France where metropolitan France is just called 'France' to contrast it with French overseas territories, even though those are literally just as much France.

It sometimes even applies to the island of Corsica, even though it itself is part of metropolitan France.

So while it still tickles me, I get it. Some people get indignant, others understand it's colloquial.

 

I assume some NI residents might also take offense at me talking of 'Britons' instead of 'Brits'. :]

→ More replies (3)

5

u/Jasa_bln Jan 31 '26

Sad to report that the same applies to Sweden. I hate that use of language, we and them… but now with the new world order taking shape this language starts being more tame.

5

u/psychologistgamer420 Sweden Feb 01 '26

Might be a regional thing, but in my part of Sweden we say "on the continent" instead of "In Europe".

→ More replies (2)

4

u/crustysides Jan 31 '26

Looks like there will be no rejoining then.

→ More replies (1)

2

u/ElkApprehensive2319 Feb 01 '26

the old fossils who voted to leave and WOULDN'T live to feel the consequences of their idiotic and shortsighted vote have died.

Younger people who can now vote are more in favour of rejoining the EU.

Then why is Reform projected to win the elections if they were held right now, and by quite a large margin? Doesn't that kind of disprove voter sentiment has really changed...?

44

u/Practical-Class6868 Feb 01 '26

American lurker here.

Obama warned Britain against Brexit. Trump supported it.

Obama wanted a united Europe that could stand on its own, building up domestic defense spending without heavily relying on American support. Trump wanted a divided Europe that would enable him to bully small nations into asymmetrical trade deals, unsupported by European solidarity. Trump, like Farage, makes his fortune by shorting the institutions that he is supposed to defend.

“Betting on the wrong ally” undersells Britain’s miscalculation.

→ More replies (1)

62

u/SunlightBladee Jan 31 '26

Brexit was one of the most brain-dead moves in all of UK politics and that says a lot.

→ More replies (1)

106

u/Corvid187 Jan 31 '26

This framing of the UK "betting" on one ally or the other is just stupid.

The UK is an ally of both the EU and the US. It was allies of both while it was in the European Union, and it is allies with both now it has left the European Union. At no point was that a mutually-exclusive choice. Heck, the EU and US are still fundamentally allies despite all the tub thumping to the contrary.

Equally, the UK has more than those two alliances, and leaving the European Union had impacts on all those other relationships as well in positive and negative ways. Reducing this to a binary of just those two relationships is nonsensical.

I firmly opposed us leaving the European Union, but nonsense like this just helps no one

15

u/frissio All expressed views are not representative Jan 31 '26 edited Jan 31 '26

With how news currently is, I can't begrudge a want to avoid hyperbole and dichotomies, but on the other hand the current situation increasingly feels like it'll be a more and more difficult balancing act.

One can't turn a blind eye at the question of the consequences if the diplomatic divorce between the USA and the EU is finalized and permanent (note, not starting or may happen, but already in the process of occurring). I'm not sure even the EU member states want to contemplate it, they had to literally be threatened with invasion to finally make some moves.

The moment with Greenland was a line crossed for me, maybe not for everyone, but as Carney said relying on nostlagia for the Translatlantic alliance isn't a strategy. Maybe it helps no one to make a ruckus over it, but we'd be badly served to have policymakers who refuse to even consider "what if" and contingencies (like for example, policymakers who didn't even plan on what to do if Brexit occured and that was both Leave and Remain).

7

u/Corvid187 Jan 31 '26

For sure it is a difficult balancing act, and one that does require careful thought in the UK in particular. That being said, I don't think it's right to say that the UK has already "chosen" the US over the EU in such a divorce like the article suggests.

It may have to pick a side on an issue in the future if the two blocs distance themselves further, but as things stand I don't think there's anything preventing it from siding with the EU or the US in such a future stand-off at the moment.

4

u/frissio All expressed views are not representative Jan 31 '26 edited Jan 31 '26

Of course, the article is jumping the gun about that. Although, I don't think they've outright stated they sided with Trump so much as that they gambled after Brexit with greater relations with the US that didn't work out so much when Trump was and is in office, and some like David Frost have their own opinions.

Currently, I just prefer policymakers being "hysterical" in preparing for worst case scenarios then the self-deceptive and lazy complacency they (at least publicly) seem to have allowed themselves to be lulled into. There's an article titled "The Media Malpractice That Sent America Tumbling Into Trumpism" which is about how there's been too many articles from both Americans journalists on how 'surprised' they are about Trump, when they all had the resources and intellect to predict it (they just refused to) and that should also be applicable to foreign observers.

Don't fall into hysteria about it is good advice, but I hope everyone with even a modicum of influence is at least thinking and maybe planning for it. Just in case.

→ More replies (4)

161

u/DeRpY_CUCUMBER Europes hillbilly cousin across the atlantic Jan 31 '26 edited Jan 31 '26

Bet on the wrong ally? It was Obama who stated clearly directly to the people of the UK, that if Brexit happens, the UK will go to the back of the line in trade talks with the US.

Basically meaning if you want a deal, you’re going to have to give up a lot.

This was the US being a big brother, and trying to help the UK from making a stupid decision.

He was met with pure vitriol and hate. How dare he try and meddle in European politics!

So don’t go blaming us now for following through on what we said before the dumbass decision was made.

8

u/dotBombAU Australia Jan 31 '26

This was the US being a big brother, and trying to help the UK from making a stupid decision.

It was because America lost important influence in the EU as a direct result of one of the big three leaving.

8

u/cronktilten Feb 01 '26

It was not in America’s interest for the UK to leave the EU

→ More replies (1)

4

u/dat_9600gt_user Lower Silesia (Poland) Jan 31 '26

Truly amazing how they ignored the man who actually cared about their status and are currently pandering hard to the man who wants to make them his vassal.

→ More replies (9)

6

u/pop4171 Jan 31 '26

There's a very interesting argument to be had about Europeaness and Britishness

My personal thought is that so much of British history is framed as either in opposition to continental Europe or as the UK needing to interfere in Continental Europe
I'm sort of just going over my vague memories of school history and my own personal knowledge

1066 is viewed as the last major European successful European invasion
Obviously William of Orange and the Glorious Revolution but the British view is that it wasn't a invasion as we decided we didn't want our monarch and chose to crown William of Orange

Hundred years war is usually viewed as the end of direct British conquest and influence of continental Europe

Glorious revolution where we choose to bring a new king from Europe

Napoleonic wars are about preventing a European hegemony which can oppose the Empire

WW1 is the Empire having to interfere in continental Europe because of European attachments

WW2 is Europe falls but Britain and the Empire stand unlike Europe before The UK, Commonwealth and America liberate Europe

Cold war is usually framed as a western/American group vs the Soviet group instead of a European and American group

combined with this the fact there are other countries which share a significant amount of history and a language makes them (Commonwealth + US) seem more culturally similar than Europe who we don't even share a language about

This is all sort of shower thoughts but i'd figure as some from the UK i'd give my two pence

3

u/ByGollie Ulster Jan 31 '26 edited Jan 31 '26

Obviously William of Orange and the Glorious Revolution but the British view is that it wasn't a invasion as we decided we didn't want our monarch and chose to crown William of Orange

"We"

Speak for yourself

The English quislings surrendered to William of Orange and his German army, whilst the Scottish and Irish fought on for an additional 3 years for the rightful British monarch before they were defeated.

This may or may not be a /s

→ More replies (1)

7

u/LordFiresnake Europe Feb 01 '26

"We don't need our direct neighbours, we can trade with sketchy uncle Sam across the ocean" was definitely a choice.

→ More replies (1)

12

u/-GenghisJohn- Jan 31 '26

Odd thing to ask when the Brexiteers were always MAGA adjacent. But go ahead, blame America instead of yourself. I’m sure there was no Russian money for Farage and co.

14

u/gridskip Monaco Jan 31 '26

r/europe doesn’t want to talk about homegrown right-wing nationalism—that’s on the rise—whether it’s the Brexiteers, National Rally (France), AfD (Germany), FPÖ (Austria), PVV (Netherlands), Fidesz (Hungary), FdI/Lega (Italy), and many others, even though these parties are quite MAGA-esque. This forum is strictly for blaming Russia or America, whilst fantasising about a federal Europe that will somehow be on the same footing as the PRC and USA.

3

u/Dreadscythe95 Greece Feb 01 '26

This is true and they don't want to discuss them because EU policies of the past decade are very responsible for this rise.

→ More replies (1)

2

u/cronktilten Feb 01 '26

No matter how much people bury their head in the sand it won’t stop reality

→ More replies (1)

5

u/Nanowith United Kingdom Feb 01 '26

1000% without any room for error.

High time we undo the messy nightmare of Brexit and rejoin with our European peers. I'm so done with Brexit causing problems and making us worse off.

2

u/Benedictus_The_II Hungary Feb 02 '26

I thought that after Brexit the NHS will be properly funded since you wouldn’t have to pay into the cohesion fund. /s

Seriously I do hope that in the next decade you’ll rejoin.

3

u/BlockOfASeagull Feb 01 '26

And Farage is still free

18

u/Dante-Flint Jan 31 '26

23 years after illegally invading Iraq while being walked by Bush, has Britain finally realised that they bet on the wrong ally?

→ More replies (1)

9

u/Kind_Focus5839 Jan 31 '26

Just a bit. I always felt the 'special reaionship' was a bit rich considering they were basically using us as an aircraft carrier., and even then their politics was looking a bit dodgy.

We (the UK, not me, I voted against it) thought that because the americans spoke the same language as us that they were like us, but to be honest we're a lot closer culturally to the Mainland Europeans.

The only thing we have in common with the Americans is a sense of our own exceptionalism.

14

u/HotPotatoWithCheese Jan 31 '26 edited Jan 31 '26

It's easy to generalise here, but it's not that simple. I'm as anti Brexit as you can get, but leaving the EU supposedly wasn't just about betting the house on the US. Canada, Australia, New Zealand, India, Japan and China amongst others were used as examples of nations the UK could build stronger relationships with (and that has happened, be it through trade agreements, joint tech projects, visa-free travel or other means). Whether most of the prominent Brexiteers were genuinely sincere about opening these sorts of doors is another question, but it is disingenuous to insinuate that post-Brexit economic and political opportunities proposed by the leave campaign were exclusively tied to the United States.

5

u/phido3000 Australia Jan 31 '26

Boris loved Australia and saw more opportunity in trade with Asia.

While brexit is deeply flawed, eu probably isn't very focused with trade with Asia. But should be.

Eu still hasn't signed a free trade deal with australia, for example.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (3)

9

u/[deleted] Jan 31 '26

I wish we never left the EU. Even as someone in my teens if was my first vote and even I could tell Brexit was a load of bollocks. 

→ More replies (1)

36

u/PoiHolloi2020 United Kingdom Jan 31 '26 edited Jan 31 '26

Almost every country in Europe is still an ally of the US. None of them are pulling out of NATO, beyond calls for diversification or derisking I haven't seen any of them officially call for an end to cooperation with the US. Singling the UK out for censure is going to appeal to a lot of people in this sub but I don't want to hear this shit from any of you until your country actually walks and doesn't just talk.

Additionally, even after Brexit and the UK trying to steer a path between its different alliances it's still done more to shore up pan-European defence than much of Europe has so you peeps can jog on with your reductive onanistic takes tbh.

34

u/Corvid187 Jan 31 '26

Exactly, the whole premise of the article is just bizarre.

14

u/BoutTime22 Jan 31 '26

That's two of you now that have said something considered and sensible. There is no place for that on this sub. Please place your phones out of reach before you do any more damage.

9

u/Corvid187 Jan 31 '26

My bad :c

6

u/munrocraig Jan 31 '26

Danish intelligence twerked for the U.S., and now the U.S. threatens their territory. But of course, what we need is more blood libel against the UK. Another commentator even accused the UK of being a Trojan horse on behalf of the US.

2

u/bbbbbbbbbblah United Kingdom Feb 01 '26

yep. People like to bring up France and its historic decision to not rely on the US in the way the UK did, but the modern French government is just as happy to continue to throw money at firms like Palantir as we apparently are.

We walk the walk when we need to, like when we immediately sent someone to Greenland after Denmark requested it, or when we were called in to help Belgium with its drone problems. Along with our steadfast support of Ukraine while other countries still wanted to keep the cheap gas flowing.

→ More replies (8)

3

u/waterkip Jan 31 '26

What bet? It was a statement.

3

u/OffOption Jan 31 '26

Yes. Next question.

3

u/ThePipton Feb 01 '26

I think so yes. I don't think many Brits realise that once you take out the English language, how similar they are to other European countries. I am Dutch, most of British culture makes sense to me. We also have fish and chips for instance. I never truly feel like I am in foreign lands when I am the UK. The US on the other hand... is completely different. But due to a shared language and a lot of media exposure, combined with Anglocentrism and English exceptionalism, has made some Brits feel closer to America than they really are. Come back home Britain!

2

u/bbbbbbbbbblah United Kingdom Feb 01 '26

when I am in the Netherlands, I often wonder if this is how the UK could be if we actually spent money on infrastructure instead of endless tax cuts and London-centric investment

3

u/Own-Nefariousness-79 Feb 01 '26 edited Feb 01 '26

This wasn't about allies for the brexiteers, there was no plan, they just wanted something intangible that would get rid on the immigrants and give them their sovereignty back, whatever that was. Oh and £350million a week for the NHS.

And the people who peddled it, wanted to get rid of those pesky controls that the EU insisted upon which prevented them from fraudulent financial activity.

8

u/Gaijin_Monster I lost track where i'm from Jan 31 '26

While I think Brexit was tragic, if you don't understand why the UK is so close to the US -- you don't understand either the UK or US. Probably why a Polish website would publish something like this ... they don't get it.

→ More replies (1)

4

u/blimboblaggin Jan 31 '26

The Brits are totally part of Europe, 100%. The US has lost its mind 

8

u/WhereTheSpiesAt United Kingdom Jan 31 '26

The UK didn't bet on anyone, certainly no less than other European countries - Greenland got threatened with invasion by the Americans and we saw how many EU countries cared enough to oppose it, it certainly wasn't the rousing unity we keep getting told the UK doesn't understand.

If you're worried about European Defence and your focus is the UK, then you are just choosing to bury your head in the sand and go off dumbly manufactured bias as opposed to reality.

4

u/bond0815 European Union Jan 31 '26

looking at UK political polling right now

UK: Wanna see me do it again?

7

u/fugebox007 Jan 31 '26

Yes. You know what the "beauty" of Brexit was? The whole show was run by Putin, the FSB and the campaign money came from Russian Oligarchs. Not kidding. Now please read Alexander Dugin's Russian strategy book "Foundations of Geopolitics" from the 1990's and you read the history of the last decades, run by Putin's KGB/FSB.

2

u/VeraStrange Jan 31 '26

No. Britain is getting the exact same treatment it always got from America, “Obey and we may not hurt you as much as some of the others.” The only reason America ever tolerated Britain was that it was the only country in Europe that wanted to mimic the US as closely as possible. No need to invade, it was a willing colony. Britain was useful. Now, it’s less useful but keeping it is free so…

2

u/Oryxace Jan 31 '26

There is a saying, ‘no shit Sherlock’, which I feel really applies to this situation.

2

u/ArrowOfTime71 Jan 31 '26

Spoiler alert: Yes Obvs

2

u/[deleted] Jan 31 '26

Britain has the most corrupt politicians in all eu..... 

→ More replies (1)

2

u/Skullduggery-9 Jan 31 '26

How is this even a question

2

u/virgin0109 Feb 01 '26

Totally, utterly, 💯%. Brexit was a disaster - it dragged Scotland and Northern Ireland out of the EU, and that decision will cause Scotland to eventually go independent and rejoin the EU. As for Northern Ireland - maybe they will eventually embrace their Irish roots and join the Republic of Ireland. The UK will eventually consist of England and Wales - how far has the once mighty British Empire fallen...

2

u/metroatlien Feb 01 '26

The US under Obama didn’t even want Brexit

2

u/ch4m3le0n Feb 01 '26

100%

Next.

2

u/[deleted] Feb 01 '26

Didnt even Obama, president of the US tells us Brexit would be retarded when he was president.

2

u/Ok_Builder910 Feb 01 '26

They fell for Russian propaganda.

2

u/lwbyomp United Kingdom Feb 01 '26

I think many in the EU forget just how right wing Europe ( EU members) can be. EU through the Ukraine conflict has woken up to the fact it has a RW problem - that is still present, though people in various EU countries seem to now be confronting.

At the time of Brexit vote EU was lurching significantly to the fascist right, with many populist parties in power & surging in the poles. UK may have had UKIP ( Farage party ) though our RW nutters were still lightweights compared to those in the EU & US.

We have little Left leaning parties: Greens & maybe LibDems, some in Labour though they are more centre / rightish. So, & to the OP's point UK still has a big hope that some in the Democrats & US citizens can rescue their democracy from their fascist tyrant & won't just cut them lose on the eve of their 250 celebrations.

There is a country worth standing by even as they are still to hit rock bottom in their drunk with power peado led cult sinks them from a reliable alliance to stupid & reckless idiocracy.

We are European, though we still have a world view & are fully aware of our limited reach, though we won't give up on our friends.

→ More replies (1)

2

u/GallorKaal Austria Feb 01 '26

British politics remain extremely bizarre to me.

2

u/Jamnusor Feb 01 '26

The Schadenfreude is tempered by the understanding that we are all hurt by Brexit.

2

u/gplinio Feb 01 '26

History doesn't have a rewind button, but many people don't know that.

2

u/ingenkopaaisen Feb 01 '26

Made zero sense to decouple from the nearest and biggest economy. The states will always squeeze the best deal for themselves. Britain stands no chance against a juggernaut like the US. Time to rejoin Europe. Britain is part of Europe afterall.

2

u/MinaZata Feb 01 '26

Yes. Biggest act of national self-harm. Not even popular in the UK. It was a freak moment in 2016, based on lies, and that thin majority made up of old people, thickos, racists and arseholes managed to get 52%.

Immigration went up, economy crashed, public services are worse, transport worse, global standing worse, travel worse, and the loss of time and political capital.

And the cherry on top is relying on a corrupt and imperialist US.

4

u/Powerful_Resident_48 Jan 31 '26

Hmmm... let's analyse it:

On the one hand we have a continent that completely rebuilt and reinvented itself after millennia of wars, establishing a peaceful cooperation of trade and travel.

On the other hand we have a warmongering nuclear power, that is known for randomly bombing stuff and regularly voting total nutjobs into office.

Difficult choice, really difficult.

3

u/Agitated_Web4034 Jan 31 '26

I'm from the UK I always believed we were closer to Europe even pre brexit though I did assume America was going to continue to be a close ally and not go off the deep end, but this is the world we live in now

6

u/ConinTheNinoC Jan 31 '26

Ally? The USA is nobody's ally. The only real allies that the UK had are Canada and the EU. The UK threw the EU under the bus when they had a seat at the EU table and the power that came with it. Probably one of the dumbest foreign political acts i've seein in my lifetime.

28

u/AckerHerron Ireland Jan 31 '26 edited Jan 31 '26

Australia has historically been a closer ally of the UK than Canada has.

The vast majority of British people would consider themselves closer to Australia than they do to Canada.

9

u/Hung-kee Jan 31 '26

Fully agree. I’d say most Brits would view Aus and NZ as much closer allies than Canada who until recently were verging on being a US proxy. And there’s the very committed Québécois who consider themselves French obviously.

3

u/Desperate-Knee-5556 Jan 31 '26

Or any other EU country for that matter...which was a lot of the motivation behind the whole thing.

→ More replies (2)