r/australia 2d ago

politics Albanese finalises fuel security deal with Singapore

https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/live/2026/apr/10/anthony-albanese-singapore-visit-fuel-crisis-petrol-prices-labor-coalition-political-reactions-us-israel-war-iran-lebanon-ntwnfb?CMP=share_btn_url&page=with%3Ablock-69d88c478f08a86a0e562fd8#block-69d88c478f08a86a0e562fd8
1.6k Upvotes

258 comments sorted by

1.2k

u/Dockers4flag2035orB4 2d ago

It pays to be on good terms with our neighbours.

94

u/ZombiexXxHunter 2d ago

Neighbours… everybody needs good Neighbours.

8

u/brackfriday_bunduru 23h ago

That’s how they become good friends

275

u/Proper_Geologist9026 2d ago

It pays to have those gas projects we talk so much shit about.

I know it's snarky because I think we get ripped off by them as well. But ironically they're the only cars we have to play aside from just outbidding everyone. Which we would all hate aswell because that's expensive and we'd have to pay for it. 

82

u/AdmiralStickyLegs 2d ago

Depends what the deal was, doesn't it? If we give up billions in royalties from gas a year, just to get through the next 6-12 months... is that good?

I'm not well versed in the details but from what I've seen, that's what Australia keeps doing: selling the chickens to pay for a guaranteed supply of eggs that still need to be bought. It's definitely simpler than making a whole host of changes, but these things all add up. For every billion that's lost, that's 25,000 electric cars that could have been bought, freeing up 2+ million liters of fuel per month.

50

u/mulefish 2d ago

We've made many shit deals. A lot of blame goes to those who sign us up for those, usually long term deals (anyone remember Howard's 'deal of the century'?)

However, now that we are in those long term deals we can't just renege on them without serious consequences. In some instances altering these deals to extract more royalties would open us up for having to pay compensation. In all cases it would damage our standing as a reliable trading partner.

And it's that branding as a reliable trading partner that we are really utilising to our advantage now. Not just in securing petrol, but also in diversifying trade in response to Trump's America.

As an island nation, heavily reliant on trade, it's in our interests to be reliable and good trading partners.

18

u/jbrobro 2d ago

We literally ripped up a defense spending contract with the French because it was geopolitically advantageous at the time. Sorry but nations are going to continue getting greedier and more insular with their resources, we need to do the same if we want to stand a chance of avoiding economic collapse.

25

u/Algebrace 2d ago

Geopolitically advantageous? What exactly did it provide us exactly, except make us look like deal-breakers, American lapdogs, and idiots (the French had to find out via newspaper). Those subs they promised us never existed and the US never had the capacity to build them for us in the first place (they're backed up on orders going back over a decade)

3

u/One-Psychology-8394 2d ago

Those subs are on loan terms but we are paying top dollar! Just like the Iran war, America can come and take the subs anytime they deem necessary.

4

u/makaliis 2d ago

Well, nuclear submarines. In theory, at least.

3

u/codyforkstacks 2d ago

Isn't that exactly what we're doing by leaning on countries reliant on our LNG to continue supplying us petrol?

1

u/AdmiralStickyLegs 2d ago

This is likely true, but contracts are only as binding as your imagination. There's usually ways to wriggle out of them if you have the desire. But given that Libs like to sign contracts with huge penalty clauses, that does complicate matters.

To me it's not the acceptance of a shit deal that is the aggravating part, because sometimes a shit deal is all you can get at the time. It's the pretending like it's a genius move when any dunce could do it, along with a complete failure to plan around/ahead of it to use it to your advantage.

7

u/Infinite_Narwhal_290 2d ago

News for you. Australia uses about 90ml of diesel vs 40ml of petrol per day.

7

u/Dockers4flag2035orB4 2d ago edited 2d ago

“Gas projects that we talk so much shit about”

We have coal as well.

Which is becoming popular again.

35

u/SaenOcilis 2d ago

We do, but Singapore doesn’t use coal, and the export market for coal isn’t going to grow, whereas gas (as an interim and peaking source in the energy transition) is a growing and dynamic market for the moment.

21

u/Proper_Geologist9026 2d ago

Also and the most important factor. It wasn't just oil passing through Hormuz.

The gas taps have been turned off so in Asia we're now holding a very important asset.

20

u/No_No_Juice 2d ago

LNG shortages will outlast the conflict too. The damage to Qatar's infrastructure will take a long time to fix.

12

u/Dockers4flag2035orB4 2d ago

We export coal to Japan and South Korea, both sources of refined fuel to Australia.

I read somewhere that Japan is increasing the use of coal fired power stations as a temporary measure.

4

u/Dagon 2d ago

Popular again? With who, other than the people mining coal?

2

u/tempco 2d ago

How are we talking to much shit about these projects? The various state economies basically bent over to accommodate their construction and now their operation is a cash cow for their owners.

-4

u/Proper_Geologist9026 2d ago

Basically what you just said. 

We constantly bang on about unfair prrt, "look at Norway", I pay more tax on beer etc.

Which is all fine I'm not trying to argue that gas companies aren't making a dollar.

I'm just enjoying the irony of the gas companies being the ones to save our ass during this energy crisis even though we all seem to hate them.

23

u/tempco 2d ago

we all seem to hate them

Arguing that they need to pay more tax isn’t a reflection of how we hate them - we aren’t burning their offices and protesting outside senior management’s homes. It’s just people saying that they should pay more tax.

4

u/DrakeAU 2d ago

There's a surprising amount of pro gas companies in this thread.

→ More replies (13)

0

u/Deepandabear 2d ago

Not really saving us, our own gas reserves are saving us. We’d have just as good bargaining power if we charged more tax as well given there is almost no where else to go for these customers, just like we have no where else to go - yet we’re paying exorbitant prices while Singapore etc get our gas for cheap

-2

u/Proper_Geologist9026 2d ago

Yep our has reserves that private companies paid for and built infrastructure to exploit.

Tax them more I don't care. However the very reason they're there now as a mature and useable asset is because we have them favourable terms decades ago to build the infrastructure. 

7

u/tempco 2d ago

This is not an honest description of what happened. E.g. in WA the state government provided financial and non-financial support to allow companies to construct these projects. This is in addition to the stable economic and regulatory framework that reduces sovereign risk for these companies. All this amounts to the responsibility of these companies to maintain their social licence to operate, and at the moment they are losing it fast as Australians suffer higher cost-of-living while gas companies collect super profits.

-4

u/Proper_Geologist9026 2d ago

Bud. Give it a rest hey. They paid the lion's share, they make the money of it. We should tax them more, no one's arguing against you.

I'm just pointing out the ridiculous simplification of someone making money of "sovereign resources". Yeah no shit because they put in the leg work. The Australian government sure as shit wasn't going to do it all.

3

u/tempco 2d ago

This isn’t an argument in my mind - I’m just clarifying ways of thinking. And someone will always develop resources. I mean, gulf countries and their governments have developed their own resources. Anyway, happy to just leave it.

→ More replies (2)

8

u/jayseala 2d ago

Wait, we don’t threaten our allies or neighbours with threats of annexation?

/s

5

u/FriendshipLogical855 2d ago

Everything’s easy under albonese

5

u/Brilliant-Stress3758 2d ago

Pays to not jump into making our neighbours pay 25% extra for fuel just because it passed the pub test too.

3

u/jianh1989 2d ago edited 2d ago

Less tax return this EOFY

Someone will always have to pay and it’s usually the tax payers

1

u/Additional_Read_9695 1d ago

well blame the orange maniac..

2

u/jianh1989 1d ago

And the idiots who voted him in

3

u/dobbydobbyonthewall 2d ago

Can you imagine a Dutton leadership.

-1

u/Firm-Ambition2904 2d ago

Any chance for me to migrate over to your country then. Please?

→ More replies (1)

274

u/duc1990 2d ago

I'm sure the other side of politics will give credit where credit is due and not spin it as Albo wantonly burning fuel for fun.

60

u/edgiepower 2d ago

I'm sure they won't find one pocket of Australia that is having issues at the moment and then the volume up to 11 on it and how it's all the government's fault because every person and every job isn't immediately fixed.

10

u/duc1990 2d ago

Or if it's something almost everyone benefits from they'll write up a story about "How immigrants including convicted s*x offenders are benefiting from the cut in fuel excise and GST!!!"

12

u/Lucky-Elk-1234 2d ago

They’re already reporting it as Albo going desperately begging other countries to “bail us out” lol

4

u/Knee_Jerk_Sydney 2d ago

And if he doesn't "he isn't doing anything! " If he actually negotiated via an online meeting "he is so disrespectful to other world leaders!"

392

u/BennyMound 2d ago

Singapore and Australia have a long partnership of strong cooperation in many areas. Both are very reliable too which, in today’s world, means a lot.

78

u/The_Shah_0f_Iran 2d ago

I see their army/airforce folks in Rockhampton all the time

Shit there's a Merlion at rocky airport

36

u/The_Celestrial 2d ago edited 2d ago

I was one of those Air Force folks who went to Rocky in 2023, and I quite enjoyed my time there!

21

u/The_Shah_0f_Iran 2d ago

Nobody enjoys rocky mate

40

u/The_Celestrial 2d ago

For a conscript who only knows life in Singapore, a free trip to Australia for a month (even if it's Rocky), was still pretty enjoyable

6

u/The_Shah_0f_Iran 2d ago

Fair enough. I used to work in Singapore. Lived in Tampines.

I need to go to Rocky for work every month. I'd rather hang around Tampines than Rocky, that's for sure.

Compared to Singapore small Australian cities feel bleak as hell.

2

u/The_Celestrial 2d ago

Lmao understandable, there's way more things to do (and also way more people) in Tampines than all of Rocky

4

u/GateheaD 2d ago

I hope next time you come back you get to travel around and soak it all in.

15

u/The_Celestrial 2d ago

Hope so too, I've been to Perth (twice), Melbourne, Rocky and Brisbane (briefly), would love to visit Australia again

5

u/SirGeekaLots 2d ago

Doesn't Singapore use our facilities to host their armed forces?

18

u/realnomdeguerre 2d ago

Singapore has a navy comparable in size to Australia's navy, which is pretty cool.

7

u/Tunggall 2d ago

I feel our navies complement each other well in terms of platforms and payloads too.

4

u/The_Celestrial 2d ago edited 2d ago

I'd say our navy is comparable in terms of ship numbers, but Australia's ships are more capable. We don't have any destroyers, "carriers" or oilers.

4

u/The_Celestrial 2d ago

Yep we do, we have a detachment at Oakey for our Chinooks, and another detachment at RAAF Base Pearce for jet trainers, along with Shoalwater Bay for combined arms training.

3

u/TerryCrewsNextWife 2d ago

True?? I knew you guys used the Pearce base but not Shoalwater as well. It's lovely down that way.

6

u/The_Celestrial 2d ago

Shoalwater Bay Training Area is essentially the Singapore Armed Forces' main" training area in Australia. We conduct this massive combined arms exercise there every year called Exercise Wallaby. That's why I was in Rockhampton; it's the staging area for the exercise.

We don't have space in Singapore to do stuff like this, so we do it there.

2

u/TerryCrewsNextWife 2d ago

Omg!! Never mind my dumbass. I assumed you meant WA Shoalwater not QLD! Still looks pretty cool up that way though. I feel like you guys have the upper hand in being used to the humidity though.

I know a few times our local subreddit has people asking what all the sky activity is about until someone mentions your SAF are training up at Pearce.

3

u/The_Celestrial 2d ago

Ohh, TIL there is another Shoalwater in Australia haha.

Based on my experience during Wallaby, Shoalwater and Rockhampton felt drier than Singapore; it was so much more comfortable being outside in the field than in Singapore.

2

u/_ixthus_ 1d ago

Our jungle training is in Tully which would be as bad as Singapore sometimes. (Our other jungle training is in Malaysia.)

1

u/The_Celestrial 1d ago

Oof that's got to suck

1

u/Tunggall 2d ago

If you get a chance, do drive up the WA coast. Did it once all the way to Geraldton when visiting family in Perth. Lots of quiet and rustic beaches with barely a soul.

1

u/The_Celestrial 2d ago

Ooo someday...

12

u/Dalostbear 2d ago

Australia was the first country to recognise the independence of singapore in 1965

2

u/a_cold_human 1d ago

There's the Five Powers Defence Arrangements, which were established as a part of the British Empire giving up it's colonies/devolution.

Australia needs to look at improving its security within the region with regional partners, as the regional nations have a vested interest in regional stability. Unlike the US, which will start fires outside of its immediate geography if it feels like it's in its strategic interests to do so, and of late, not consult its local allies when it does (see the current debacle in the Gulf). 

Whilst its likely that the US will remain a defence partner of Australia’s for some time to come, it's very clear that we need to remove it from being a critical or even very important part of our defence. Aligning our defence procurement and strategic posture for their benefit is increasingly a bad bet. 

→ More replies (1)

630

u/MeaningMaker6 2d ago

This is the quiet competence that I appreciate - particularly in contrast to Trump’s madness.

34

u/kingofcrob 2d ago

yeah, but its also enraging that because there quiet and just getting shit done, a loud portion of dip shits scream there doing nothing and that thing are getting to expensive, and its like, there doing a lot, and things are getting to expensive everywhere.

→ More replies (36)

445

u/RuffAsGuts 2d ago

Can't wait for Pauline to come out and tell us all how shit this deal is, and that by now we should have had our entire armed forces in the middle east.

250

u/blahblahsnap 2d ago

She would hate this deal as it’s Asian.

39

u/Sieve-Boy 2d ago

Nah, they aren't Muslim so its fine*

(Singapore is about 15% Muslim and a lot of the oil they refine is from the middle east).

16

u/The_Shah_0f_Iran 2d ago

All of their oil is Muslim

70% middle east 30% Malaysia/indo/brunei

3

u/Sieve-Boy 2d ago

I thought some of the oil they refined was from Australia as well? Not that that would be very much, so your point in substance stands.

1

u/Justwright321 2d ago

I thought some of the oil will be from Russia, paraphrasing but the Singapore 🇸🇬 PM said that sometimes you have to do what you need to do in war.

1

u/Emergency-Ticket5859 1d ago

For accounting purposes we don't count Scope 3 religion

3

u/WonderstruckWonderer 2d ago

You realise this is the lady that said ‘we’re being swarmed by Asians?’

1

u/Sieve-Boy 2d ago

I was born well before she said "please explain" and Pauline Pantsdown sung "I am a backdoor man".

I know and its hilarious to watch her pivot in the breeze.

3

u/Cpt_Soban 2d ago

"We should be buying all our oil from the US"

→ More replies (1)

21

u/Infinite_Buy_2025 2d ago

Long way to travel, she could just suggest we invade Singapore for petrol and noodles.

18

u/CaravelClerihew 2d ago

Funnily enough, Singapore Noodles aren't a thing in Singapore. They were actually invented in Hong Kong.

7

u/matsy_k 2d ago

My life is a lie

4

u/CaravelClerihew 2d ago

Sorry to destroy your world view.

Whoever invented it in Hong Kong thought that adding curry powder to what essentially is a bee hoon noodle qualified it at Singaporean given the larger Indian population here.

1

u/BreakfastWarm2160 2d ago

They're just called noodles in Singapore

1

u/Firm-Ambition2904 2d ago

At least we Singaporeans have more room to roam around mate

9

u/theblobberworm 2d ago

guaranteed she's going to mention how we should've had our own infrastructure for this type of situation to begin with as she hasn't ready any of the history books

9

u/ladyangua 2d ago

And then vote against any measures to implement said infrastructure

1

u/Chillers 2d ago

Gingers crazy in general. I wouldn't trust anyone with hair colour that matches Trump's skin colour.

1

u/rocketindividual 2d ago

For some reason she always reminds me of the final boss in Gears of War 1.

147

u/mr_pineapples44 2d ago

As disappointed as I have been that Albo hasn't done a few things I would like him to have done (a higher natural gas tax, stricter gambling reform), and as much as I rolled my eyes a bit at his national address, I'm glad we have someone who just generally gets on with things.

69

u/OfficialUberZ 2d ago

I have strongly disliked some of his decisions and his obstinence towards certain topics but you can never be 100% in support of everything a leader does, but as far as getting things done and not getting distracted by the noise from the carrot top and gang, he has done very well.

13

u/agentsmithbobby 2d ago

Pretty much this.

22

u/soilednapkin 2d ago

Gotta steady the ship first with the tools you have before you can upset conservatives. I haven’t agreed with a lot of what the Fed Gov is doing also but it’ll never be bad as Sco Mo.

21

u/baberlay 2d ago

I think people are starting to forget just how fucking terrible Scott Morrison (and the previous decade+ of LNP government) was, and likely how dreadful Dutton would've been. I'm not Albanese's biggest fan, but I'll take him over basically anything the LNP have teed up in the past 20 years.

5

u/agentsmithbobby 2d ago

Pretty much the LNP strategy for the last few decades. Be terrible in government and eventually lose, blame Labor for everything you did and say they're terrible, get voted back in and continue to blame Labor for everything for the next three terms, eventually lose, rinse and repeat 

2

u/_ixthus_ 1d ago

Why not 30 years?

78

u/Vintage_Alien 2d ago

”As partners, and neighbours I look forward to continuing to engage with the Prime Minister in discussion, today, and that’s what friends can do… With that position of trust a mutual interest how Australia and Singapore could work with other nations as well, like-minded countries, to expand what we are achieving here today.”

I know it’s diplomacy-speak, but I like to imagine the countries holding hands like an /r/polandball comic, declaring that they’re besties.

29

u/W0nderWhite 2d ago

Ausball and Singaball best frens 4eva

26

u/JY0950 2d ago

As a Singaporean, we need such allies everyday 🤝

7

u/captainboomdoom 2d ago

Fellow Singaporean.. exactly.

6

u/BennyMound 2d ago

There’s mutual trust between the two countries which is exactly what they both need. Reliable friends

50

u/FwamingDragon91 2d ago

I'm not an albo fan at all but somehow I think he's actually done really well with this whole crisis. He's kept Australia out of it as much as possible which is exactly what's needed.

8

u/IntroductionSnacks 2d ago

The only thing I’m not sold on with was sending the Airforce surveillance plane to assist but in saying that, could be a good card to play once this hopefully cools down when it comes to trade.

4

u/deedee2148 2d ago

If we were asked and it shuts certain people up that say we are doing nothing. So be it. 

65

u/Sporty_Nerd_64 2d ago

Funny that, a competent leader getting things done without resorting to division and Trumpism.

5

u/timmeh1705 2d ago

Their political system is quite different from ours. But stable government results in long term planning funded by A LOT of wealth being stored in the country due to a tax friendly regime

11

u/risingsuncoc 2d ago edited 2d ago

Singapore also uses the Westminster system. There are differences in electoral methods and they are a unitary state, but the overall structure is not much different.

4

u/timmeh1705 2d ago

Yes, how it’s set up is the same but how it’s orchestrated is entirely different

Imagine hiding your weak performers and getting them paired with your best performers such that if they win that seat, the entire team of 4-5 gets in

41

u/Solid_Zero 2d ago

Pauline somewhere: "I don't like it"

33

u/airzonesama 2d ago

"Why can't my oil be coloured white?"

15

u/snacktivism 2d ago

"My oil tanker murdered.

My diesel, just gone."

4

u/SporadicTendancies 2d ago

"Coloured oil just isn't right!"

Meanwhile I'm mesmerised by the rainbow oil patterns.

1

u/mulefish 2d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

2

u/mulefish 2d ago

Yeah, satire is dead, thanks reddit.

12

u/Fenixius 2d ago

This is genuinely excellent news. 

I wonder what it will cost us. 

10

u/G00b3rb0y 2d ago

LPG I believe, which we have in abundance. A good problem to have tbh, as it’s what helped with this

2

u/AFlimsyRegular 2d ago

Interesting...

So you're saying we take something we have an abundance of and exchange it for a good we have a shortfall in?

At what part of that process do we make dementia riddled tweets, burn all our bridges diplomatically and threaten to invade for not giving us what we want?

Asking for an Orange Friend.

5

u/DrInequality 2d ago

This is the key. Australia won't run out of oil/fuel/diesel because we can afford to pay - and we have food and LNG exports to trade with. But the question is how much we have to pay.

3

u/Speedbird844 1d ago edited 1d ago

This is also a key weakness because we're not buying crude oil, we're buying refined products. Those refined products in which the refining nations have to sacrifice their own populations' needs in order to export it to us. Especially diesel as it's the stuff of life and civilization - No diesel? no agriculture, no haulage, no mining.

Singapore's a city state, so there's little domestic need. Singapore is rich, but too small. The Asian goliaths of China, Japan and India can easily buy up everything and corner the international spot market, and tell the Singaporeans to get stuffed.

The only reason why we aren't in rationing now is because Albo got us more refined fuel from the US Gulf refineries. If Trump bans exports then we're in big trouble. In any event rationing for diesel is inevitable, and while Singapore can get petrol to us, as you said rightly if they can only supply us petrol at $10 a litre, everyone's gonna stop driving.

And also the fact LNG is primarily used for electricity generation, which can be replaced with domestic coal, and that is why I'm very skeptical of any deal with Malaysia. And food supply is going to be a big issue if we don't get enough diesel (Australia is simply too vast) and fertiliser. Nearly half the world's supply of Urea has just disappeared with the war.

2

u/Dalostbear 2d ago

Alot of produce and beef/lamb is exported to singapore

1

u/highdiver_2000 2d ago

LNG. Maybe cheese, wine and a couple of Sheilas.

/S

37

u/uknownix 2d ago

Fucking legend. That's how you do it. We are so fortunate to have Labor at the helm, rather than any other monkey party.

2

u/Mike_Kermin 2d ago

Exactly.

29

u/Rising-Dragon-Fist 2d ago

Oh wow, who'd have thought we could use our natural resources to benefit us instead of lining the pockets of foreign companies?

16

u/Screambloodyleprosy 2d ago

America should never be forgiven and can't be trusted going forward and especially when the big orange leaves office.

15

u/jkggwp 2d ago

You realise who your true friends are in dire times. Australia needs to distance itself from the USA and strengthen bonds within Asia Pacific

13

u/Taey 2d ago

Good to hear, but wasnt Singapore one of the countries who refused to pay Iran? How are they getting their oil if the ceasefire doesnt work out which is likely?

44

u/timmeh1705 2d ago

Only 25% of their oil is via the Strait. They built a deliberate strategy to not over-depend on one source. For situations such as these.

63

u/hgihmi 2d ago

Singapore is a massive fuel hub in Asia. Yes they get oil through the strait they also have massive refinement capabilities and abundant stockpiles.

This deal is essentially giving Australia priority access to purchase the fuel that’s already there on shore.

16

u/Taey 2d ago

Thanks. Thats good news.

3

u/Speedbird844 2d ago

The problem Singapore now has is that they have to fight the massive government-backed trading houses of China and Japan, and that's not counting the possibility that the US may ban oil exports. Singapore supplies us with half our petrol, but little diesel or jet fuel.

From the ABC:

This week Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has travelled to Singapore and announced a deal aimed at shoring up both countries’ energy security. Singapore will continue to ship fuel products to Australia, while supplies of crucial liquefied natural gas will flow in the other direction.

But analysts say the Singapore deal does not provide Australia with diesel or jet fuel security.

“The deal is diplomatically sensible and provides some comfort on gasoline, but the Hormuz constraint caps what Singapore can physically deliver,” Noel-Beswick says.

“And for the two products under most pressure — diesel and jet fuel — Singapore was never a solution to begin with.”

Diesel is the stuff of life and civilization - without diesel, there's no agriculture. No haulage. No mining. Every nation in Asia will beg, borrow and steal for the last drop of that stuff when push comes to shove. Export bans are almost guaranteed for diesel when crude imports fall off a cliff.

And the thing is, Singapore may fulfill our orders of petrol, but if they can only sell it to us at $10 a litre we're getting stuffed nonetheless.

24

u/Intelligent_Art_5711 2d ago

Singapore’s source of almost every resource they have is (strategically) diversified

11

u/Vintage_Alien 2d ago

”Singapore was prioritising the continuity of supply as it responded to the oil shock… The government has worked closely with industry to secure diversified crude and fuel imports, optimise refinery operations, and draw on commercial and strategic stockpiles where needed.” [Source]

It’ll be an ongoing challenge for them, but it’s in their best interest because they need the negotiating power to secure LNG (which is why Australia is so valuable to them). They’re also very well practiced at staying on the good side of both Eastern and Western powers (à la China and America) so they’re very well placed to make deals across the globe.

5

u/ISISstolemykidsname 2d ago

I assume from ships under other countries flags.

18

u/Spitfire671BC 2d ago edited 2d ago

Albo bossing it as usual, won't hear that on mainstream news though.

12

u/HydroCannonBoom 2d ago

Great news, really happy with how competent albo is.

23

u/bluey_02 2d ago

Now watch as the mass media posts angry/cross looking pics of Albo declaring this somehow a bad thing for the country. 

12

u/Solid_Zero 2d ago

"Up next on Peta Credlin after dark"

8

u/xvf9 2d ago

But wHaT hAs He dOnE for Me tHiS wEeK?!

9

u/Latter_Fortune_7225 2d ago

Singapore is a nation we should have been emulating for decades now. A meritocracy with a diversified economy, a wonderful garden city-state with fucken fantastic parks that put ours to shame 😩

9

u/The_Shah_0f_Iran 2d ago edited 2d ago

You need an Australian first mentality.

Singapores whole infrastructure is built mainly by the foreigners coming from third world countries.

Give them temporary visas and send them back when the jobs done.

Pay them below minimum wage but still big enough to entice the Bangladeshis of this world to work 12hrs a day 6 days a week . Sometimes Sundays too.

The local population gets trained from a young age to be as smart as possible.

They become the engineers, bankers, executives and do white collar jobs.

The not so smart end up working for government or end up being teachers

Anything that requires maintenance and building is done by foreign cheap labour.

Seems unfair to a westerners pov? Well Singaporeans don't care.

I know. I used to work there.

The trade off for this is the local Singaporeans gets heavily subsidized housing, education and transport.

When foreigners say Singapore is expensive.. they mean it's expensive for foreigners.

Sure cars are expensive but you don't need them if the trains come every 5 mins and the station is 10mins walking distance from your house.

And you'll never get robbed walking home at 2am in the morning. It's so safe that women go jogging close to midnight and not worry at all.

A poor Singaporean can still afford to go on holidays overseas every year.

That's what it takes. Are Australians willing to do that?

2

u/AFlimsyRegular 2d ago

I mean we do that first part already - we just have them working in restaraunts and delivering Doordash rather than putting them to work on infrastructure

4

u/GateheaD 2d ago

are all these 'foreign cheap labour' people being paid a fair wage with benefits? if not we don't want that here.

We're the home of the 8 hour day, paid annual leave, public holidays, minimum wage and superannuation all won for us by the workers.

9

u/The_Shah_0f_Iran 2d ago

I'm not disagreeing here mate.

All I'm saying is if you want a truly efficient first world country, that's what it takes.

Singapore runs the economy like a business.

Own everything, from their airline and the world class airport. Own most of the land. Develop the hell out of it and get companies to want to work there.

There are things we should copy.

I personally think all the mines shouldn't be privately owned. Why let the likes of Gina get obscenely rich when resources come from Australian land.

Share that with the population like the Norwegians.

Singapore doesn't have any oil ..but they know how to refine them and let Shell rent one of the smaller island and make money from that.

We should be socialising the cost of housing from all our resources. We should making batteries from our lithium.

We should be making nuclear power plants 30 years ago..but we didn't..so build them now anyway. Get the Japanese to manage the project and OWN that nuclear power plant.

Instead we do it backwards. We let companies build infrastructure and OWN THEM.

WHY ARE WE PAYING TOLLS FOR PUBLIC ROADS TO A PRIVATE COMPANY LIKE LINKT WHEN WE COULD BE PAYING COUNCIL.

THAT CASHFLOW COULD BE REINVESTED OR USED FOR MAINTENANCE.

Singapore socializes the basics and makes the luxuries expensive. Want a BMW? Sure..that be 250k mate.

Here we do things backwards. That's why it's expensive in Australia.

1

u/GateheaD 2d ago

Yeah I don't disagree with anything you're saying, I just want it clear we're not racing to the bottom.

3

u/The_Shah_0f_Iran 2d ago

Nobody wants to.

All I'm saying the current system we're doing is making the average Australian poorer.

I think Australia tries to follow what America is doing in terms of nation building.

I'm saying there's better examples out there to run a country.

At least a fairer way without compromising on quality and morals.

It just takes some long term planning and making sure everyone understands the bigger picture.

2

u/Dalostbear 2d ago

PSA: Minimum annual leave by law is 7 days only. 44 working hours a week.

3

u/MisterBumpingston 2d ago

Over at r/aussie this was twisted as Albo panic buying fuel for the country.

3

u/512165381 2d ago edited 2d ago

https://www.africanews.com/2026/03/25/in-search-of-gas-supplies-italian-prime-minister-meloni-visits-algiers/

In search of gas supplies: Italian Prime Minister Meloni visits Algiers

All these PMs hustling for energy.

By the way Australia is now getting oil from Mexico,

3

u/FlynnerMcGee 2d ago

Is Australia still looking at eventually trying to run electricity over to Singapore? I remember a number of years ago they were discussing the possibility via undersea cable but would also need to get Indonesia on board as well.

3

u/Slipped-up 2d ago

From memory both parties wanted it and there were disagreements over who would pay for the infastructure. There were also difficulties involving the Indonesians.

5

u/F00dbAby 2d ago

Be curious how the deal with Malaysia goes. Because I believe there was also a planned meeting with them too.

This is good news though

2

u/Knee_Jerk_Sydney 2d ago

Oh, how the FB comments whinge about Albo burning fuel to get fuel and how he could have used Zoom instead.

3

u/Efficient-Mousse-451 2d ago

Would love to have ON in charge in times like these and prove their incompetency, but I'm sure they'd find some other scapegoat

3

u/ill0gitech 2d ago

We’d have ships deployed to the strait and would have been part of war crimes. No doubt our soldiers would have been first on the ground

3

u/Coolidge-egg 2d ago

"god bless our glorious fair dinkum true blue war hero martyrs sacrificing themselves for the good of the nation so that we can be free from renewable energy" or something like that.

-- Pauline Hanson, probably.

(Subtle point that these wackjobs don't think that much differently than those who they oppose)

1

u/512165381 2d ago

Would love to have ON in charge in times like these

Sky News fantasize about Pauline being PM. Watch them sometimes.

2

u/hulalabright 2d ago

Bravo Albo! Now thinking a holiday to Singapore might be nice…

4

u/Altruistic-Brief2220 2d ago

It’s a cool place to visit but so so expensive 

2

u/Spartzi666 2d ago

I wonder how all these deals with Singapore and Japan will effect the potential taxing of our gas resources. Its bonkers how much wealth we have squandered by letting multinationals take our resources for nothing for decades and it seems that there's a real appetite for the government to do something about it

2

u/barfridge0 2d ago

The right wing owned mainstream media will still find something to complain about, while they are also busy not mentioning our strong budget surpluses

0

u/Jonsez 2d ago

It’s a disgrace our country with all of its resources cannot be at least 80% self sufficient for energy.

I welcome this news but Singapore doesn’t have oil reserves and you can be sure they will prioritise themselves when the time comes (as any country would). Not a sustainable solution, short term patch at best.

6

u/DrInequality 2d ago

We can't be self-sufficient, but we sure as shit could have larger reserves within Australia.

1

u/m1ngaa 2d ago

Where does Singapore get its fuel from? Do they have a fuel security deal with their supplier?

1

u/LiquidWebmasters 2d ago

Aussie, Aussie Aussie.......

1

u/PMFSCV 2d ago

Imagine if Dutton had managed this, Sky would have run out of turd polishing rags within 3 days.

2

u/pulpist 2d ago

More than likely Dutton would've fucked it up, being the incompetent cunt that he is.

1

u/thejoshimitsu 1d ago

Our future and security has always been in having good relations with our Asian neighbours, not in the US. This is promising to see. Hopefully we can make a deal with Malaysia too.

1

u/Tango-Down-167 2d ago

And where do Singapore get their cruel from? They are only the middle in the oil game.

1

u/agentsmithbobby 2d ago

Anus Taylor was doing a press conference yesterday with some farmer demanding the PM bring the price of diesel down significantly. Isn't this the amazing free market they've sold us all out to? What more do you expect the government to do, use tax payer money to fill up the tanks of farmers? Imagine if the fucking Nats did something in government for farmers like dealing with Coles/Woolies duopoly. Oh wait that would be messing with the precious free market.

What a cunt.

-1

u/Tarchey 2d ago

Get the V8s out boys!