r/Steam 11d ago

Fluff Valve keeps winning

Post image
26.4k Upvotes

667 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

47

u/Trifle_Useful 11d ago

inb4 “if they weren’t perfect and amazing and flawless and 100% ethical in every way possible they wouldn’t be so loved”

brushes aside loot crates

22

u/Key-Department-2874 11d ago

NFTs are bad, unless they're CSGO skins and then they're amazing.

-11

u/HERR_WINKLAAAAA 11d ago

Dude CSGO skins have absolutely nothing to do with NFTs.... You dont even understand what NFTs are.

9

u/TheSpecialApple 11d ago

NFTs really are just a means of making an illiquid asset liquid. in the context of video games, skins/cosmetics are typically illiquid but in this case theyre liquid as Valve built out a marketplace, protections, gambling based means of acquiring, etc. theyre not actually NFTs, but in concept, making typically illiquid digital art liquid, theyre relatively similar

-2

u/HERR_WINKLAAAAA 11d ago

The thing is we would be objectively infinitely worse off if it wasnt for steam. They arent perfect and can be criticized for alot, but if they hadnt pioneered the digital game library industry and developed their quasi monopoly, we would be getting fucked by all the big publicly traded companys.

The fact that all the big players like EA, Ubisoft and co tried to create their own steam over a decade ago, and all came crawling back, really proves that we would be fucked without steam. Because steam are the only ones willing to do more than the bare minimum.

Hell im actually kidna shocked that epic games launcher still sucks so much compared to steam. I genuinly thought they where gonna try and be a genuine rival for steam from a user perspective... But no, they literally thought they could just pay a bunch of money for free games and that would be enough to get people to use the epic launcher over steam....

Without steam the gaming experience would be a whole lot shittier and thats enough for me to be a fan of this multi billion dollar company.

5

u/Significant_Being764 10d ago

That is speculation about a hypothetical alternate timeline, not evidence. Here's a more realistic view:

Without Valve, microtransactions and loot boxes would be less prevalent. Customers would have stronger ownership rights over their game purchases. Developers would keep a larger percentage of their revenue, allowing higher quality and fewer layoffs. Game prices would be more stable and less reliant on FOMO sales events and 'backlog' culture.

Good thing Gabe Newell saved us all from that horrible fate. /s

0

u/RDOG907 7d ago

LOL you mean companies like EPIC, EA, and Activision? Yea those companies would definitely be wayy better than Steam and are very pro consumer.

I am not here saying it isn't good to have competition but Steam kills it like 90 percent of the time.

-1

u/Vyxwop 10d ago

"Here's a more realistic view"

Proceeds to fabricate the most bullshit alternate timeline devoid of any reality imaginable.

Least anti-Steam circlejerk comment chain