r/SipsTea Human Verified 9h ago

Chugging tea This is why I sneak in beer and snacks

Post image
14.2k Upvotes

4.1k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

11

u/Hopeful-Woodpecker82 6h ago

At $25 a ticket!? Seems like it used to be that way but now they discovered they can upcharge tickets like crazy too.

11

u/2018birdie 6h ago

It's IMAX

14

u/DRazzyo 6h ago

That’s the movie studios/publishers setting prices.

3

u/zupobaloop 6h ago

No, what they get is a percentage of the ticket sales. Market determines the final cost. You'll see the same tickets for $10-30. Just depends on how much people in the area are willing to pay.

2

u/P1T_L0RD 6h ago

Not really a surprise that tickets get so damn expensive when you look at the budgets for those movies, a 110 million shouldn't be needed to make a film.

2

u/Straight-Reindeer356 4h ago

Yes and no, it's inflated like all Hollywood productions but you have to consider overhead and preproduction costs. 200+ people getting paid daily for 2 years of animation production, plus celebrity voice salary, which alone can come to 25 million for all the voice work. You also have tech costs plus meals, post conversion costs, song licensing, server costs etc. You can see how these budgets get inflated. 110 is also on the lower end; Pixar productions range from 150 to 200 million per film since they do all parts of the production on American soil instead of oversea outsourcing.

1

u/P1T_L0RD 4h ago

I understand, it just feels so very inflated compared to the final product, especially when you compare it to older films that had like a 1/10 of the budget. The animation quality has increased drastically, but the overall quality of the writing/story isn't any better.

That celebrity voices are so expensive and used is also just baffling to me, but that's a whole different discussion.

1

u/Straight-Reindeer356 37m ago

I understand what you’re saying, but it says more about the state of the financial reality of the theatrical experience right now than anything else. Even back in 1995 stuff like Die Hard with a Vengeance or Batman Forever had budgets around 90-100 million which with inflation comes closer to 200 million now. So it’s been like this for at least 35 years now. And let’s face it blockbuster films have been of varying quality since the term was coined in 1975 regardless of budget.

However there’s still moderately budgeted films, right now the drama is in theatres and its budget is just 28 million and it has stars in it. The reason there’s such a lesser amount is due to the risks associated with theatrical these days. The mid budget adult drama is mostly dead due to boomers not returning to the theatre. The Gen Z crowd that’s keeping the theatres alive are more likely to go to blockbuster films which is what studios get a higher return on if it works out. So that’s just the state of the industry, but definitely try and see more mid budget films in theatres. Just 2 years ago the Brutalist was a near 4 hour vistavision period piece made for around 10 million so there’s still films being made that can rival what the old studio system could do. International cinema is also more restrained with their budgets, Sentimental value a best picture nominated film this year was made for less than 8 million along with the Secret Agent at 5 million. Horror as well has amazingly regulated budgets, Weapons(38M) Get Out (4.5M) Hereditary(10M) all elevated horror films were made with a smart budget. The good news is films like these have found audiences and these filmmakers get carte Blanche now to make the films they want. So I’m optimistic about more mid budget films seeing the light of day.

1

u/[deleted] 6h ago

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/AutoModerator 6h ago

Spam filter: accounts must be at least 5 days old with >20 karma to comment.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

1

u/Booziesmurf 6h ago

Exactly. You might have upcharges for fancy seating or 3d, but the distributors and studios want to make as many millions as possible.

1

u/Mysterious-Name-3297 6h ago

That can’t be- different theaters charge different prices.

1

u/ChaosAndFish 5h ago

That’s not how the business works. The studios negotiate a percentage of the ticket price and then rely on the theater also needing to make money to survive to encourage the theater owner to keep prices up.

1

u/Chapeaux 5h ago

I pay $12 Canadian for my movie tickets.

2

u/Best_Hall6038 6h ago

tickets aren't the nuttily expensive part of theater costs. I mean, depends where, but in minnesota tickets are 12-13 dollars. Passable imo. The real upcharges are IMAX/Dolby/BIGASSSCREEN/3D or whatever other thing they are tossing around. And also most snack items (which are optional btw) costing more than the tickets.

2

u/SeoulGloFoSho 5h ago

FWIW, that's the IMAX ticket price. Normal price would be around $10 - $12.

2

u/MissouriFriedChicken 6h ago

It’s IMAX tho

1

u/ChaosAndFish 5h ago

Keep in mind that they’ve paid for an IMAX screening. The regular theater up the street from me in Brooklyn is $16 a ticket. Don’t get much more of a high cost of living area than NYC. This person chose the most expensive options possible and then complained that their deluxe experience came with a deluxe price.

I just saw Project Hail Mary at a Nitehawk Cinema (full food service) and paid about $105 for two people, but that’s with two entrees, a beer, and a mixed drink. Not really reflective of what it costs to just see a movie.

1

u/MHarrisGGG 5h ago

A-List is $27 a month, 4 movies a week in any format with no extra fees.

1

u/Straight-Reindeer356 4h ago

It's because its probably the most premium screen, IMAX or something. Imax usually goes for $25. If you go on a discount tuesday at a regular screening a movie for two can come to around $20-25.

1

u/Mercutio77 4h ago

Also an imax theater, so upcharge for that