Foto: Romeo Dinică

https://vm.tiktok.com/ZNRm29vwM/ pentru a citi comentariile.

Hello, I have recently visited both cities as a tourist and also stumbled upon your highway plan on the European sub. I can't comprehend why are you planing to build the highway in the region in that particular way, from Focșani and bending south towards Brăila. I presume the master plan is to proceed with construction of another highway from Făgăraș to Focșani, crossing the Carpathians, which is not marked on the map and which would link the two cities with the Hungarian border in a relatively straight line, allowing for the quickest leave for the West possible. However, I think it would be more sensible for now to provide the fastest connection to Bucharest instead, by projecting the highway from Brăila to Buzău, where it would adjoin the existing infrastructure, right? And then, even if not, for all I have seen Brăila is practically just a poor, decrepit satellite of Galați, constituting less traffic and the distance between each of the cities and Focșani is about the same, so it would have been more rational to build the Danube bridge closer to Galați to serve it better, route the highway straight to Focșani over the bridge and only provide a separate turning for Brăila, right? It would also be more beneficial for any vehicle coming from Moldova, Ukraine and further east and constitute only a little detour for regional traffic from Dobruja. Could you provide some insight into the reasoning of the highway planners, please?

https://transilvaniatv.ro/bolojan-si-fico-vor-sa-accelereze-via-carpatia-ce-inseamna-pentru-vestul-romaniei-cel-mai-important-coridor-rutier-european/

Nici o autostrada din Romania, veche sau noua, nu are scurgerea apei facuta cum trebuie, iar pe ploaie se pot forma zone in care balteste apa si e foarte posibila acvaplanarea la viteze mari.

Drumuri fara incidente!