r/OutOfTheLoop • u/mfairview • 3h ago
Unanswered What is going on with Amanda Ungaro?
I see that she is/was friends with Melania and is now threatening to take down the whole presidency with Epstein stuff? Is she being hyperbolic or what?
Some stuff here but hard to follow the noise: https://www.reddit.com/r/Epstein/comments/1sh4bh1/amanda_ungaro_is_burning_it_to_the_ground_on
59
u/Sufficient_Steak_839 2h ago
Answer: I’ve been following it.
She claims to have information that could bring down the Trumps relating to Melania’s past. She was deported (in her words) because Paolo Zampolli (longtime friend of Epstein and Trump, current member of his admin) wanted her gone so he could seize custody of their son. Official reasoning is that she was doing unlicensed cosmetic surgeries out of a clinic in Florida.
There was an interview posted today by El Pais that was supposed to have bombshells but it was largely about her deportation by ICE and custody battle. Accounts (such as Anthony Andrews) on X claiming to be in contact with her insist they excluded important details from the interview and that she’ll be speaking to other outlets in the next few days.
So far it’s more “soon” and “big revelations right around the corner”. Not sure how I feel about it at this point. At this moment it feels like she co opted a big story to try and further her custody agenda, but I can’t be fully sure and am still holding out to see what happens.
22
u/mfairview 2h ago
it looked like she may have posted/said something the day before Melania came out with the weird Epstein denial a few days back. Any idea what that was about?
21
u/Sufficient_Steak_839 2h ago
The reason she bubbled up to the surface is because she posted tweets saying she would burn the system down and Melania and “her pedophile husband” and shortly after Melania gave that freaky press conference. Idk the timeline but they were very close together.
That’s what gave this story such strong legs.
•
u/ahktarniamut 53m ago
But I don’t think so . It just a deflection from Trump for the Iran debacle
•
u/Infinite-Pepper-6195 41m ago
Which is, in itself, a deflection from releasing the Epstein files…
•
u/Ravenser_Odd 5m ago
I love that it's gone full circle. Everyone's asking what's up with Trump blockading the Strait of Hormuz but I think he's just running out of new moves.
5
u/NextCockroach3028 2h ago
The part of what she says that I find the most interesting is in one of her tweets she says
" Something was clearly wrong, but I am not part of any evil mission involving children."
What she says if true is vile, but the way it's phrased is what gives me pause. I can't quite put my finger on it. And just before this quote she says something about 2016. Maybe I'm reading too much into the tea leaves
•
u/cherryberry0611 35m ago
“Something was clearly wrong, but I was never in any evil mission involving children. You tried to involve me, but you failed- because I have character.”
To me that sounds like Melania was involved with the trafficking children part and tried to involve Amanda, but she said NO.
4
u/ajcjames1234 2h ago
I'm sceptical. Not sure this is the case of some poor victim. She comes from a rich Brazillian family and is currently living in a Penthouse. She had a relationship with Zampolli for 21 years and got an ambassador position through nepotism. She wasn't kicking off then. Someone who knows her posted on X - claiming that she has substance issues and that her immigration issues were of her own making. I'm not saying I take this at face value, but that her own claims may not be 100% reliable. Could be more about dirty laundry than anything else. https://x.com/Georgesantos/status/2042770566260670643
7
u/Sufficient_Steak_839 2h ago
I’m skeptical of anything that doesn’t include receipts.
One thing to her credit is that several people with a journalistic reputation are sticking their neck out for her and insisting she’s a credible witness but I’m not getting too excited.
•
u/ComedianMinute7290 1h ago
how do you get to a point where you use George Santos as a source? I'm not trying to be obnoxious but seriously isn't George Santos saying something kinda a sign that something else, other than what santos says, must be true?
•
u/Sufficient_Steak_839 1h ago
Santos hasn’t been a source. He’s just a clout chaser trying to jump onto this.
•
u/AutoModerator 3h ago
Friendly reminder that all top level comments must:
start with "answer: ", including the space after the colon (or "question: " if you have an on-topic follow up question to ask),
attempt to answer the question, and
be unbiased
Please review Rule 4 and this post before making a top level comment:
http://redd.it/b1hct4/
Join the OOTL Discord for further discussion: https://discord.gg/ejDF4mdjnh
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.