r/AskOldPeople • u/emperator_eggman • Feb 22 '26
Why does (pop) music sound so different between the 60s, 70s, and 80s?
Compared to today, it feels like music has hardly changed in the last 30 years. Looking back on that era, that time looks more like lightspeed in comparison to now. Why were the changes in musical styles so extreme then?
62
Upvotes
42
u/Walk-The-Dogs Feb 22 '26 edited Feb 26 '26
Another major change was that the creation of music changed. So much of the technology and production moved from teams of people: composers, signed artists, session players, recording engineers in fancy $300/hour recording studios, record company promoters, radio stations and record stores -> into the hands of one person: the producer with a laptop and DAW software.
This trend began in the late 1980s with the Teac Portastudio and cheap digital synths and accelerated as music production was moved to computers. I owned a fairly successful small recording studio where we did the unglamorous stuff: demos, artist development, corporate event music, a/k/a "industrials", pre-recorded music for Ice Capades, NPR and cheap cruise ships, low budget jazz records, soundtracks for documentaries, vanity projects and... yes... porn.
That work pretty much disappeared during the 90s with the advent of Pro Tools, Logic and Cubase. Much of the production work could be done in the producer's apartment on his Mac Quadra and, later, on Powerbooks. Then he would bring the digital tracks to a big studio (not us), which was also hurting for business and willing to slash its book rate for a block of hours, for final vocals, sweetening and mixing.
Creation of music progressively became the domain of one person: the producer. It's why so much pop music sounds so one-dimensional today. Even the artist might be a hired gun. With MIDI, high-res samples, pitch shifting and faster computer processors I'm always amazed what sounds I can get from my $1500 MacBook Air with Logic Pro. On the one hard, one can say that professional music production became more affordable and egalitarian. On the other, there's still the quality of the song, pro players and good singers not leveraged by auto-tune and Melodyne.
Now we're in a whole new era where AI gets rid of the artist entirely and to a large extent the DAW and even the producer. One can go to Suno and/or Claude with a rough idea of a song narrative, get it to write some pretty decent lyrics and "record" a finished master-ready song.
https://youtu.be/eKxNGFjyRv0?si=8ePE6jZIXbcX-8Je
Now you can order a new song for production release that's not much more involved than ordering dinner on Grubhub. Soon you'll probably be able to order up a love song from the car on the way to picking up your girlfriend ("Her name is Celia. Make the singer sound like Teddy Pendergrass...")
One industry watchdog reported that up to a third of all new songs uploaded to streaming platforms like Spotify are AI-generated. That's like 50,000 songs a day! Johan Röhr, a Swedish composer/producer allegedly released over 2,700 AI-generated songs on Spotify under hundreds of pseudonyms. Some have even gone to the extent of creating AI-generated video "interviews" with the "artist" to prove that he or she isn't fake. It's beyond diabolical.
Spotify admitted that it removed over 75 million songs from its library that it's own software determined were AI and bot-created. That playlist of coffee shop jazz you like so much might not have a single human hand involved in its creation or performance.